Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676538›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025

Development of a machine learning-derived model to predict unplanned ICU admissions after major non-cardiac surgery.

Catherine Chiu, Matthias R Braehler, Anne L Donovan, Atul J Butte, Romain Pirracchio, Andrew M Bishara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine ChiuDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Matthias R BraehlerDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Anne L DonovanDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Atul J ButteBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St. Office 5212, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Romain PirracchioDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Andrew M BisharaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, USA. andrew.bishara@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Real-time Prediction of Adverse Outcomes After SurgeryK23GM151611 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Andrew Bishara · 2023 to 2026
$753k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM151611NIGMS NIH HHS K23GM151611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned postoperative intensive care unit admissions (UIAs) are rare events that cause significant challenges to perioperative workflow. We describe the development of a machine-learning derived model to predict UIAs using only widely used preoperative variables.

methodsThis was a 3-year retrospective review of all adult surgeries under the General, Vascular, and Thoracic surgical services with anticipated length of greater than 180 minutes at a single institution. A UIA was defined as any post-operative patient recovering in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) requiring direct transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) for higher level of care. We developed our prediction model with a gradient-boosting decision tree algorithm (XGBoost). The model incorporated sixteen generalizable predictor variables that were derived from the demographics and surgical booking details. Validation and evaluation were performed with 10-fold cross validation, and model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio.

resultsA total of 4658 patients were included for analysis. The incidence of UIAs was 2.3%. With 10-fold cross validation, the area under the ROC curve was 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86). Two decision thresholds were used, which achieved the best specificity of 94% (95% CI 92-96%), best positive likelihood ratio of 4.22 (95% CI 0.99-8.79), and best sensitivity of 82% (95% CI 58-100%).

conclusionsOur machine learning-derived model is a reliable tool for the perioperative clinician to predict a rare outcome in high-risk patients using only preoperative variables. Future studies will include prospective validation of this model at other institutions and real-time incorporation for improvement in perioperative workflow.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPatient AdmissionPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedDecision TreesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPredictive analyticsUnanticipated ICU admission

Identifiers

PMID40676538
PMCPMC12273467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.