ArticleOral radiology2026
Is it possible to apply a paralleling technique to different ethnicities in Hong Kong?
Article in Oral radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the applicability of a paralleling technique in dental patients in Hong Kong via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.
methodsWe analyzed CBCT images of 28 patients who underwent CBCT examination at Prince Philip Dental Hospital between March 2016 and July 2021. Overall, 136 teeth were studied. We created an 8 mm-thick reconstructed maximum intensity projection image to show each subject tooth, traced them with the surrounding structures, such as the hard palate and the buccal skin surface of the maxilla, and measured various parameters for determining the tooth length and palatal height. We also considered the applicability of the parallel technique.
resultsWe successfully measured the parameters with excellent intra- and inter-observer reliability indices. The results revealed that the applicability of this technique was not feasible. These results were similar to those of a previous study. Only two periapical radiographs showed distorted shapes and inconsistent root lengths.
conclusionsUsing CBCT image analysis, this study clarified that the paralleling technique is not applicable even for patients in Hong Kong. Clinicians should note that the paralleling technique is not strictly a paralleling method and may lead to image distortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.