ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Optimizing radiation therapy for merkel cell carcinoma: evaluating prognostic factors and treatment outcomes.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer. Surgery and radiation therapy (RT) are common treatment options; however, an optimal RT strategy has yet to be established. Therefore, the present study examined the outcomes of MCC patients treated with RT, with the aim of elucidating current RT practices and identifying prognostic factors for RT optimization.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 32 non-metastatic MCC patients treated with RT. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to examine the effect of each factor on outcomes.
resultsMedian age was 80 years, with a median follow-up period of 26 months. The median dose was 52 Gy in 26 fractions and combined with surgery in 23 patients. Two-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 94, 61, and 74%, respectively. The Log-rank test showed that tumor size ≥ 5 cm was associated with worse LC (p = 0.03). Male sex and the absence of surgery correlated with worse PFS (p = 0.047 and 0.023, respectively). Performance status ≥ 2, the absence of surgery, and RT margin < 3 cm correlated with worse OS (p = 0.006, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). RT dose, intensity-modulated RT, and elective nodal irradiation were not associated with any outcomes in this population.
conclusionRT achieved high local control; however, the metastasis rates were high. A wide RT margin and the combination of RT with surgery may improve the outcomes of MCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676436What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.