ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Disparities in referrals to fertility preservation services for a pediatric and adolescent population.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to determine if clinicians who provide potential gonadotoxic medications refer pediatric patients differently for a fertility preservation (FP) consultation based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or preferred language of the patient.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care center. Patients assigned female at birth aged 5-21 years who underwent treatments considered medium to high risk for gonadotoxicity from 2017 to 2022 were included. Patients were excluded if they were referred from outside institutions already undergoing treatment or if they had a diagnosis of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The primary outcome in the study was the presence of a referral to the FP team for patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy.
resultsThe total cohort included 236 patients, 122 (51.6%) of whom were referred to the fertility preservation team. There was no significant difference in patients' racial or ethnic backgrounds between referred and not referred. Those not referred were significantly younger (13.4 vs 16.3, P < .001) and less likely to speak English (7.1% vs .8%, P = .013). Patients less than 10 years of age made up 36.8% of those not referred, and only 1.6% of those referred. There was no difference in average Area Deprivation Index score between those referred and not (4.4 vs 5.0, P = .16), and referrals did not differ significantly between patients of low, medium, or high socioeconomic status (P = .28).
conclusionOnly half of appropriate patients were referred for fertility preservation counseling, and non-English speakers were significantly less likely to be referred, demonstrating a substantial need to address underlying referral disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.