Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676388›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Predicting liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients using routine biochemical tests enhanced by machine learning.

Efe Cem Erdat, Merih Yalciner, Engin Eren Kavak, Ismail Dilli, Omur Berna Cakmak Oksuzoglu, Hakan Akbulut, Gungor Utkan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dissecting component-specific and sustained benefits of integrated psychosocial-nutritional care in gastric oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Efe Cem ErdatDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Balkiraz Mh. Tip Fakultesi Cad. No 1, Mamak, Ankara, Turkey. cemerdat@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1250-1297
Merih YalcinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Balkiraz Mh. Tip Fakultesi Cad. No 1, Mamak, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-2188
Engin Eren KavakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3247-5361
Ismail DilliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9043-9790
Omur Berna Cakmak OksuzogluDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-8646
Hakan AkbulutDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Balkiraz Mh. Tip Fakultesi Cad. No 1, Mamak, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1631-5739
Gungor UtkanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Balkiraz Mh. Tip Fakultesi Cad. No 1, Mamak, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8445-6993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver is the most common metastatic site in colorectal cancer. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different machine learning (ML) models in predicting liver metastasis in CRC patients using routine biochemical tests. PATIENTS AND

methodsCross-sectional study employed various ML algorithms for predictive modeling. The study was conducted at two academic reference centers in Ankara, Turkey: a total of 810 CRC patients diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. The training and internal validation dataset comprised 710, and external validation dataset included 100 patients. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥ 18 years with a pathological CRC diagnosis, pre-treatment biochemical tests, and known initial staging. Exclusion criteria encompassed non-adenocarcinoma histologies, incomplete biochemical data, other malignancies.

resultsLogistic regression achieved the highest internal validation AUC (0.956), accuracy (0.901), and F1 score (0.936), with a sensitivity of 0.971 and specificity of 0.703. ElasticNet and Lasso regression followed closely with AUCs of 0.958. In external validation, logistic regression maintained high performance (AUC 0.951, accuracy 0.900), while the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) model achieved perfect sensitivity (1.0) with an AUC of 0.891. The optimal predictor combination included ALP, LDH, CEA, and CA-19-9.

conclusionDifferent ML models, can effectively predict liver metastasis in CRC patients using routine biochemical tests. Further refinement and prospective clinical trials are necessary to validate and implement these predictive tools in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorArtificial intelligenceBiochemical testsColorectal cancerLiver metastasisMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.