ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Novel risk predictor of spontaneous rupture and hemorrhage of renal cell carcinoma based on clinical and radiographic characteristics.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate and validate clinical and imaging predictors of spontaneous rupture and hemorrhage (SRH) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and to develop an individualized risk prediction nomogram.
methodsA cohort of 914 RCC patients was analyzed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between SRH and non-SRH groups, with baseline characteristics balanced using propensity score matching. Univariate analysis, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify SRH risk factors. A predictive nomogram was constructed and internally validated.
resultsAfter matching, baseline characteristics were comparable. Protective factors against SRH included posterior perirenal fat thickness (HR
conclusionsPerinephric fat stranding and the renal tumor vascular-to-renal artery diameter ratio are significant risk factors for SRH in RCC, while perirenal fat thickness and solid tumors are protective. Patients with fumarate hydratase deficiency are at increased SRH risk and require special clinical attention. The developed nomogram may assist in individualized risk assessment and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.