ReviewArchives of microbiology2025
Unveiling the potential of antimicrobial peptides to combat Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimycobacterial peptides as natural therapeutics for tuberculosis: mechanisms and structural features.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- Peptide-Based Strategies AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is a severe disease that causes considerably high morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income developing nations. The causative agent of TB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), has evolved medication resistance, which has hampered the treatment of TB. The need for new anti-TB medications has been driven by the growth of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) mycobacterial strains, resistance to current medicines, and a rising financial burden. In this context, antimycobacterial peptides obtained from diverse sources, including human cells, bacteria, mycobacteriophages, plants, and animals, may serve as potential antituberculosis agents. This is because the majority of these peptides exhibit dual benefits, namely, bactericidal activity against Mtb and immunoregulatory properties. AMPs are strong contenders for alternative therapeutic alternatives or adjuvants in TB treatment because some of the peptides have the added benefit of interacting synergistically with antituberculosis drugs as well, improving their efficacy. This review highlights AMPs' potential modes of action, benefits, and drawbacks compared to traditional antibiotics, as well as how to solve usage-related issues to increase their therapeutic potential. We also discuss the difficulties in translating benchside research to the bedside, assess the state of the development pipeline, and examine the anticipated socioeconomic effects worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.