ArticleBiodegradation2025
Harnessing SDS as a source of sulfur: a bioremediation strategy of Fischerella sp. lmga1.
Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Adaptation of Mesorhizobium Symbionts Associated With Caragana in Northern China Deserts.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a widely used anionic surfactant, is a pervasive aquatic pollutant with documented ecotoxicity and persistence in the environment. In this study, we investigated metabolic response of the filamentous, heterocytous cyanobacterium Fischerella sp. lmga1 under sulfur starvation, focusing on its capacity to degrade SDS and utilize it as an alternative sulfur source. Sulfur-deprived cultures supplemented with 150 µM SDS initially exhibited chlorosis and physiological stress, but showed significant recovery by 14 days, including increased growth and better photosynthetic performance. A significant rise in intracellular sulfur content was observed, suggesting active sulfur acquisition. Expression analysis revealed strong induction of genes involved in sulfur uptake and assimilation (e.g., cysT, cysW, sbp, sat), alongside an ~ 880-fold upregulation of sdsA1 on day 10, encoding an SDS hydrolase. Correlation analyses showed that increased sdsA1 expression coincided with improvements in viability and sulfur status. This underscored a coordinated mechanism of SDS degradation and concomitant sulfur assimilation in Fischerella, indicating towards a novel adaptive strategy. Thus, this study establishes Fischerella as a promising candidate for bioremediation of sulfonated pollutants in aquatic systems and expands the knowledge of metabolic plasticity of cyanobacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.