ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
Does pes anserinus release affect outcomes in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy?
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMedial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is an effective treatment for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal management of the pes anserinus during the procedure. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pes anserinus release on radiological healing, alignment correction, and functional outcomes after MOWHTO. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 73 patients who underwent MOWHTO with locking plate fixation. Patients were divided into two groups based on surgical preference: pes anserinus release (n = 35) and non-release (n = 38). Functional outcomes were assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at baseline, six months, and 12 months. Radiographic parameters included the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), tibial slope, and time to bone union. Complications were also documented.
resultsBoth groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and preoperative alignment. The non-release group achieved bone union significantly earlier (median 4.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.019). There were no significant differences in HKA angle, mMPTA or tibial slope between the groups. At six months, KOOS scores were significantly higher in the non-release group (p < 0.001); however, by 12 months, both groups demonstrated similar functional outcomes. No major complications or nonunions were observed in either group.
conclusionsPreserving the pes anserinus during MOWHTO does not compromise alignment correction and may enhance early bone healing and functional recovery. Routine release of the pes anserinus may be unnecessary, and its preservation could offer clinical benefits during the early postoperative period. Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40676248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.