Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676245›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2025

Advances in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Marc Scherlinger, Antonios G A Kolios, Vasileios C Kyttaris, George C Tsokos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genome-wide meta-analysis with 1,590,596 individuals identifies 12 novel risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc Scherlinger *Rheumatology department, National reference center for rare autoimmune systemic diseases, RESO; Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. marc.scherlinger@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9453-5895
Antonios G A Kolios *Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Vasileios C KyttarisDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
George C TsokosDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. gtsokos@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9589-2360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematous is a clinically and pathogenetically heterogeneous disease that has long challenged researchers and clinicians aiming to improve its treatment. Advances over the past 75 years have revealed a number of key immune mechanisms that drive clinical manifestations, paving the way for the development of therapies that go beyond broad immunosuppression to improve clinical efficacy and reduce side effects. These include approaches aimed at specific immune pathways, and emerging efforts to restore immune homeostasis, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies to eliminate pathogenic B cells, low-dose interleukin 2 or regulatory T cell therapies. Although hopes for durable remissions or cure are rising, major obstacles remain owing to the complex nature of the disease. In this Review, we discuss emerging therapeutic strategies designed to address these challenges.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicAnimalsB-LymphocytesHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.