Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676194›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

A comparative analysis of the outcomes of Rezūm therapy based on prostate size: a four-year retrospective analysis.

Mohamed Samir, Mahmoud Ahmed Mahmoud, Hossam Abdelsamie Abdelmonem, Mohamed Elrefaie, Khaled Abdelsattar Gad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07169773 (Comparison Between Convective Radiofrequency Water Vapor Thermal Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07169773 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison Between Convective Radiofrequency Water Vapor Thermal Ablation (REZUM) Versus Tamsulosin in Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement

TypeinterventionalSponsorkhaled Abdelsattar Gad IbrahimRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsProstate HyperplasiaArmsRezum, Tamsulosin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohamed SamirDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. m.samir-84@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0162-079X
Mahmoud Ahmed MahmoudDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hossam Abdelsamie AbdelmonemUrology Department, Armed Forces College of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed ElrefaieMilitary Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt.
Khaled Abdelsattar GadMilitary Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of Rezūm therapy in small versus large prostates through a four-year follow-up. PATIENTS AND

methodsOne-hundred seventy patients who underwent Rezūm therapy were retrospectively included and divided into 2 equal groups, small (˂ 80gm) and large prostate groups (80-120 gm). Both groups were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months post-procedure for operative time, number of vapor injection, catheterization time, hospital stay and post-procedure: prostatic size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), post-void residual (PVR), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and complications.

resultsThe number of vapor injections was significantly higher in the large prostate group compared to the small prostate group (p < 0.001). Operative time and catheter duration were significantly longer in the large prostate group (p < 0.001), while hospital stay was similar between groups (p = 0.407). At 48 months post-Rezūm, both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement in all measured outcomes (Qmax, IPSS, PVR, QoL, PSA, IIEF, and prostate size) (p < 0.05). Regarding postoperative complications, there were no significant differences between the groups except that the need for retreatment was significantly higher in the large prostate group.

conclusionRezūm therapy offers a safe and effective treatment option for both small and large prostates with sustained improvement over four years. However, patients with large prostates exhibited a higher retreatment rate (15.2%).

Indexed as

ProstateProstatic HyperplasiaAgedFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBPHLarge prostateRezūmSmall prostate

Identifiers

PMID40676194
PMCPMC12271246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.