ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Costochondral junction variations in children younger than 2 years.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCostochondral junction fractures are considered specific for child abuse and typically heal with a deformed costochondral junction.
objectiveTo evaluate the types, location, and incidence of costochondral junction variations that can mimic fractures. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 15-year retrospective study was conducted on children under 2 years of age who underwent chest and abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scans for pneumonia, fever, congenital lung disease, pain, or appendicitis. Randomized selection included 120 chest and 120 abdominal CT scans. Demographic and clinical information was obtained from medical record reviews. Two pediatric radiologists independently reviewed the studies and indicated the presence and location of costochondral junction variation patterns (spurs), and fissure, horizontal lucency, corner, or bucket handle as identified on two consecutive slices on axial views. Disagreements were resolved by a third radiologist. We excluded patients with underlying medical conditions that could affect the skeleton and studies with motion artifacts. A t-test was used to evaluate the relationships between age, CT slice thickness, and the diagnosis of costochondral junction variations. Kappa statistics were used to evaluate agreement.
resultsA total of 123 children were excluded due to motion artifacts (n = 30), trauma (n = 31), being evaluated for child abuse (n = 3), slice thickness of 5 mm (n = 1), and underlying medical conditions (n = 58). The final group included 117 children (73 males and 44 females) with an average age of 1 year; 64 had chest and 53 abdominal CT scans. Agreement was fair (kappa = 0.29) at the patient level and poor at the rib level (kappa = 0-0.64). The final number of variations, after resolving disagreements with a third radiologist, was 46 of costochondral junction variations in 19 children (16.2%, 19/117); all were costochondral junction spurs at the levels of the second to eighth ribs. Costochondral junction variations were significantly more common in younger children (average 0.7 ± 0.6 years vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 years, P = 0.024) and when there was thinner CT slice thickness (average 1.6 ± 1.4 mm vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 mm, P = 0.041).
conclusionCostochondral junction variations were identified in 16.2% of children under 2 years of age, and some may mimic healing costochondral junction fractures. There was only fair agreement between radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.