ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of dexamethasone therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage: a propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Olink Proteomics Reveals CCL2 Aggravates Perihematomal Edema After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in High-Altitude Migrants Via CCR2/NF-κB-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Is Dexamethasone Helpful in Reducing Perihematoma Edema and for the Outcome of Intracerebral Hemorrhage?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the most common type of hemorrhagic stroke. The therapeutic effects of dexamethasone in ICH patients remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the association of dexamethasone use with the all-cause mortality rate in critically patients with ICH. This was a retrospective cohort study based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. Eligible ICH patients were selected and divided into two groups on the basis of whether they received dexamethasone treatment during their hospitalization. A 1:1 propensity score matching was applied. The relationship between dexamethasone and mortality was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. LASSO regression was used to select covariates for the Cox regression model, and the proportional hazards assumption of the Cox model was assessed using the Schoenfeld residuals test. Time-dependent covariates were applied to variables that did not meet the proportional hazards assumption. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses, along with interaction tests, were conducted to account for potential confounding factors. A restricted cubic spline analysis and subsequent survival analysis were performed to explore the dose-dependent relationship between dexamethasone use and mortality in ICH patients. A total of 3214 patients were included in the study. Among them, 529 patients received dexamethasone treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed substantial differences of survival rates in dexamethasone group and non-dexamethasone group. The fully adjusted multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that the dexamethasone has a robust effect in reducing short-term mortality in critically patients with ICH, but there is no evidence of its benefit for long-term survival. Subgroup analysis revealed differences based on sex, with a weaker protective effect of dexamethasone in female patients and a stronger protective effect in male patients. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a nonlinear relationship between dexamethasone and the risk of all-cause mortality. Low-dose dexamethasone may reduce mortality risk, whereas higher doses are associated with increased mortality risk. Our study suggests that low-dose dexamethasone use may be associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in ICH patients. However, future prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.