ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning analysis of drug solubility via green approach to enhance drug solubility for poor soluble medications in continuous manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine-Learning-Driven Molecular Design and Structure-Property-Performance Relationships in Pharmaceutical Chemistry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Uncertainty-aware physics-informed meta-learning for predicting niosomal particle size across formulations and processing conditions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Data-driven modeling of supercritical CO₂ processing with optimized machine learning: prediction of clobetasol propionate solubility.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis using machine learning methods for determination of pharmaceutical solubility in supercritical COFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Data-driven prediction of lipophilic drug solubility in supercritical COFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning analysis of oral solid dosage formulation solubility variations by adjusting pressure and temperature.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing is crucial and can be analyzed via advanced computational models. Machine learning is a strong computational paradigm that can be integrated into a continuous process to enhance the drugs' solubility and efficacy. In this research, a simulation method for estimating pharmaceutical solubility was considered in green solvents to develop the idea of continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing. Artificial intelligence strategies were utilized to apply models for fitting several solubility datasets. Using machine learning techniques, the solubility of Clobetasol Propionate (CP) was modeled at temperature values between 308 K and 348 K, and pressures in the range of 12.2 MPa to 35.5 MPa. In this research, two models-a neural network-based model called MLP (Multilayer Perceptron) and a probabilistic model called GPR (Gaussian Process Regression)-along with an ensemble voting model based on these two, were considered for modeling. A GWO (Grey Wolf Optimization) method was also used to tune their hyperparameters. All three models have significant performances on estimation of CP solubility. But the voting model, which is a combination of the other two models, is better than the other two models in terms of accuracy. The ensemble voting model, integrating MLP and GPR with GWO optimization, offers superior accuracy for predicting CP solubility, advancing continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.