Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676129›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Large language model integrations in cancer decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuexing Hao, Zhiwen Qiu, Jason Holmes, Corinna E Löckenhoff, Wei Liu, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Saleh Kalantari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07760857 (Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07760857 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of an Intelligent Centre-adaptive Multi-modal Fusion Framework (Cad- MMFF) to Overcome Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies and Optimize MRI Utilization: a Hybrid Retrospective-prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2030Enrolled400ConditionsProstate Cancer (Diagnosis)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuexing HaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. yh727@cornell.edu.
Zhiwen QiuCornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Jason HolmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Corinna E LöckenhoffCornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. liu.wei@mayo.edu.
Marzyeh GhassemiMassachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Saleh KalantariCornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

Dose Linear Energy Transfer Volume Histogram and Dosimetric Seed Spot Analysis in Spot Scanning Proton TherapyR01CA280134 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280134NCI NIH HHS R01CA280134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support cancer patients and clinicians in decision-making. This systematic review investigates how LLMs are integrated into oncology and evaluated by researchers. We conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the ACM Digital Library through May 2024, identifying 56 studies covering 15 cancer types. The meta-analysis results suggested that LLMs were commonly used to summarize, translate, and communicate clinical information, but performance varied: the average overall accuracy was 76.2%, with average diagnostic accuracy lower at 67.4%, revealing gaps in the clinical readiness of this technology. Most evaluations relied heavily on quantitative datasets and automated methods without human graders, emphasizing "accuracy" and "appropriateness" while rarely addressing "safety", "harm", or "clarity". Current limitations for LLMs in cancer decision-making, such as limited domain knowledge and dependence on human oversight, demonstrate the need for open datasets and standardized evaluations to improve reliability.

Identifiers

PMID40676129
PMCPMC12271406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.