Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Task based evaluation of sparse view CT reconstruction techniques for intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis using an AI observer model.

Matthew Tivnan, Irene Désirée Kikkert, Dufan Wu, Kai Yang, Jelmer M Wolterink, Quanzheng Li, Rajiv Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew Tivnan *Radiology Department, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Irene Désirée Kikkert *Department of Applied Mathematics, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. i.d.kikkert@student.utwente.nl.
Dufan WuRadiology Department, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kai YangRadiology Department, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jelmer M WolterinkDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Quanzheng LiRadiology Department, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rajiv GuptaRadiology Department, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) holds promise for reducing radiation exposure and enabling novel system designs. Traditional reconstruction algorithms, including Filtered Backprojection (FBP) and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR), often produce artifacts in sparse-view data. Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) offers potential improvements, but task-based evaluations of DLR in sparse-view CT remain limited. This study employs an Artificial Intelligence (AI) observer to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FBP, MBIR, and DLR for intracranial hemorrhage detection and classification, offering a cost-effective alternative to human radiologist studies. A public brain CT dataset with labeled intracranial hemorrhages was used to train an AI observer model. Sparse-view CT data were simulated, with reconstructions performed using FBP, MBIR, and DLR. Reconstruction quality was assessed using metrics such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), and Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS). Diagnostic utility was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for One-vs-Rest and One-vs-One classification tasks. DLR outperformed FBP and MBIR in all quality metrics, demonstrating reduced noise, improved structural similarity, and fewer artifacts. The AI observer achieved the highest classification accuracy with DLR, while FBP surpassed MBIR in task-based accuracy despite inferior image quality metrics, emphasizing the value of task-based evaluations. DLR provides an effective balance of artifact reduction and anatomical detail in sparse-view CT brain imaging. This proof-of-concept study highlights AI observer models as a viable, cost-effective alternative for evaluating CT reconstruction techniques.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial HemorrhagesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningHumansROC CurveSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID40676122
PMCPMC12271333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.