ArticleScientific reports2025
Task based evaluation of sparse view CT reconstruction techniques for intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis using an AI observer model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) holds promise for reducing radiation exposure and enabling novel system designs. Traditional reconstruction algorithms, including Filtered Backprojection (FBP) and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR), often produce artifacts in sparse-view data. Deep Learning Reconstruction (DLR) offers potential improvements, but task-based evaluations of DLR in sparse-view CT remain limited. This study employs an Artificial Intelligence (AI) observer to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FBP, MBIR, and DLR for intracranial hemorrhage detection and classification, offering a cost-effective alternative to human radiologist studies. A public brain CT dataset with labeled intracranial hemorrhages was used to train an AI observer model. Sparse-view CT data were simulated, with reconstructions performed using FBP, MBIR, and DLR. Reconstruction quality was assessed using metrics such as Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM), and Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS). Diagnostic utility was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values for One-vs-Rest and One-vs-One classification tasks. DLR outperformed FBP and MBIR in all quality metrics, demonstrating reduced noise, improved structural similarity, and fewer artifacts. The AI observer achieved the highest classification accuracy with DLR, while FBP surpassed MBIR in task-based accuracy despite inferior image quality metrics, emphasizing the value of task-based evaluations. DLR provides an effective balance of artifact reduction and anatomical detail in sparse-view CT brain imaging. This proof-of-concept study highlights AI observer models as a viable, cost-effective alternative for evaluating CT reconstruction techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.