Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676105›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An AI method to predict pregnancy loss by extracting biological indicators from embryo ultrasound recordings in early pregnancy.

Lijue Liu, Yuan Zang, Huimu Zheng, Siya Li, Yu Song, Xue Feng, Xiyuan Zhang, Yaoxu Li, Lulu Cao, Guanglin Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lijue LiuSchool of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, China.
Yuan ZangSchool of Automation, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, Hunan, China.
Huimu ZhengLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Siya LiCAS Blue Bay Cloud Technology (Guangdong) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 518001, China.
Yu SongDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xue FengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, 300222, China.
Xiyuan ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha City, China.
Yaoxu LiClinical Research Center (CRC), Medical Pathology Center (MPC), Cancer Early Diagnosis and Treatment Center (CEDTC) and Translational Medicine Research Center (TMRC), School of Medicine, Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing University, Wanzhou District, Chongqing, 404100, China.
Lulu CaoDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital and Beijing Key Laboratory for Rheumatism Mechanism and Immune Diagnosis (BZ0135), Beijing, 100044, China.
Guanglin ZhouLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Tingting DongLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Qi HuangLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Teng PanLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China. 2570758402@qq.com.
Jinhai DengRichard Dimbleby Department of Cancer Research, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Kings College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. jinhaideng_kcl@163.com.
Danling ChengLonggang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity and Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen, 518172, China. danling713@qq.com.

Funding

Chongqing Natural Science Foundation CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0761Science and Technology Program of Longgang District, Shenzhen LGKCYLWS2023019Scientific Research Project of Xiang Jiang Lab 23XJ02002Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20240813144105007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-ultrasound results are widely used in early pregnancy loss (EPL) prediction, but there are inevitable intra-observer and inter-observer errors in B-ultrasound results especially in early pregnancy, which lead to inconsistent assessment of embryonic status, and thus affect the judgment of EPL. To address this, we need a rapid and accurate model to predict pregnancy loss in the first trimester. This study aimed to construct an artificial intelligence model to automatically extract biometric parameters from ultrasound videos of early embryos and predict pregnancy loss. This can effectively eliminate the measurement error of B-ultrasound results, accurately predict EPL, and provide decision support for doctors with relatively little clinical experience. A total of 630 ultrasound videos from women with early singleton pregnancies of gestational age between 6 and 10 weeks were used for training. A two-stage artificial intelligence model was established. First, some biometric parameters such as gestational sac areas (GSA), yolk sac diameter (YSD), crown rump length (CRL) and fetal heart rate (FHR), were extract from ultrasound videos by a deep neural network named A3F-net, which is a modified neural network based on U-Net designed by ourselves. Then an ensemble learning model predicted pregnancy loss risk based on these features. Dice, IOU and Precision were used to evaluate the measurement results, and sensitivity, AUC etc. were used to evaluate the predict results. The fetal heart rate was compared with those measured by doctors, and the accuracy of results was compared with other AI models. In the biometric features measurement stage, the precision of GSA, YSD and CRL of A3F-net were 98.64%, 96.94% and 92.83%, it was the highest compared to other 2 models. Bland-Altman analysis did not show systematic deviations between doctors and AI. The mean and standard deviation of the mean relative error between doctors and the AI model was 0.060 ± 0.057. In the EPL prediction stage, the ensemble learning models demonstrated excellent performance, with CatBoost being the best-performing model, achieving a precision of 98.0% and an AUC of 0.969 (95% CI: 0.962-0.975). In this study, a hybrid AI model to predict EPL was established. First, a deep neural network automatically measured the biometric parameters from ultrasound video to ensure the consistency and accuracy of the measurements, then a machine learning model predicted EPL risk to support doctors making decisions. The use of our established AI model in EPL prediction has the potential to assist physicians in making more accurate and timely clinical decision in clinical application.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousArtificial IntelligenceUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultCrown-Rump LengthFemaleGestational AgeHeart Rate, FetalHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstDeep learningFirst trimesterMachine learningPregnancy loss predictionUltrasound videos

Identifiers

PMID40676105
PMCPMC12271456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.