ArticleScientific reports2025
Innovative design and comprehensive ergonomic assessment of an auxiliary colonoscopy handle device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a critical tool for diagnosing and treating bowel diseases, yet it demands high physician skill and can lead to suboptimal patient experiences. Recent technological advancements have aimed to enhance colonoscopy procedures by improving ease of use and patient comfort. This study introduces a novel colonoscopy handle auxiliary device designed to reduce operator fatigue and improve work efficiency. The device was evaluated through surface electromyography (sEMG) to assess muscle engagement and a questionnaire to gauge subjective experiences. The results showed that the novel handle significantly reduced muscle load in several key muscle groups, particularly the left biceps brachii, left flexor carpi radialis, and left abductor pollicis brevis, without compromising the efficiency and quality of the colonoscopy procedure. Subjective feedback indicated that the novel handle was perceived as more comfortable and easier to operate, especially by novice users. The study suggests that the novel handle has the potential to alleviate occupational injuries among endoscopists and enhance the overall colonoscopy experience for both operators and patients. Further research is needed to refine the handle's design and validate its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.