ArticleScientific reports2025
Low sensory responsiveness is associated with accelerated aging in midlife.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the associations between sensory responsiveness levels and biological age among midlife adults, providing insights into the aging process. A cross-sectional study was conducted from 2020 to 2021 on a subset of the Jerusalem Perinatal Study in Israel, including 96 midlife adults (aged 45.65 ± 0.66, 49% women). Biological age was estimated using physiological and blood biomarkers, following the Klemera-Doubal method. The Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire Scale and the Social Engagement and Activities Questionnaire were employed, along with physical capacity measurements such as muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and gait analysis. The hypothesis suggested that levels of sensory responsiveness (high or low) would be associated with biological age. Results indicated that low sensory responsiveness was positively associated with older biological age (adjusted R²=0.25, p < 0.01), after controlling for age, sex, social engagement, education and physical capacity. Conversely, high sensory responsiveness showed no significant correlation with biological age. These findings suggest that sensory responsiveness may serve as a potential marker for biological age during midlife and should be considered when addressing early signs of aging, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying aging and age-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.