Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A lightweight framework to secure IoT devices with limited resources in cloud environments.

Vivek Kumar Pandey, Dinesh Sahu, Shiv Prakash, Rajkumar Singh Rathore, Pratibha Dixit, Iryna Hunko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivek Kumar Pandey *Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dinesh Sahu *SCSET, Bennett University, Plot Nos 8, 11, TechZone 2, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201310, India.
Shiv Prakash *Department of Electronics and Communication, University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. shivprakash@allduniv.ac.in.
Rajkumar Singh Rathore *Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, UK. rsrathore@cardiffmet.ac.uk.
Pratibha Dixit *King George Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Iryna Hunko *Department of electric station and system, Vinnytsia National Technical University, Vinnytsia, 21021, Ukraine. iryna_hunko@vntu.edu.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Billions of IoT devices increasingly function as gateways to cloud infrastructures, making them an inevitable target of cyber threats because of the limited resources and low processing capabilities of IoT devices. This paper proposes a lightweight decision tree-based intrusion detection framework suitable for real-time anomaly detection in a resource-constrained IoT environment. Finally, the model also makes use of a novel leaf-cut feature optimization strategy and tight adaptive cloud edge intelligence to achieve high accuracy while minimizing memory and computation demand. In terms of memory, they also use only 12.5 MB in it and evaluated on benchmark datasets including NSL-KDD and Bot-IoT, it gives an accuracy of 98.2% and 97.9%, respectively, and less than 1% false positives, thereby giving up to 6.8% accuracy over some traditional models such as SVM and Neural Networks and up to 78% less energy. It is deployed on Raspberry Pi nodes and can do real-time inference in less than 1 ms and 1,250 samples/sec. Due to the energy efficient, scalable, and interpretable architecture of the proposed solution, it can be implemented as a security solution for IoT use cases in Smart cities, industrial automation, health care, and autonomous vehicles.

Identifiers

PMID40676045
PMCPMC12271337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.