Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40676035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimization of ionic strength of nutrient solution for enhanced hydroponic watermelon yield and quality in greenhouse.

Md Mukhtar Hossain, Yuki Shibasaki, Rina Nakao, Kazuki Nitano, Fumiyuki Goto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Mukhtar HossainThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, 890-0065, Japan. mhossain@ru.ac.bd.
Yuki ShibasakiFaculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Saga, 840-8502, Japan.
Rina NakaoFaculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Saga, 840-8502, Japan.
Kazuki NitanoFaculty of Agriculture, Saga University, Saga, 840-8502, Japan.
Fumiyuki GotoThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, 890-0065, Japan. gotoh@cc.saga-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing nutrient solution concentration (NSC) in hydroponic systems is crucial for enhancing nutrient efficiency and maximizing crop growth, yield, and quality. This study evaluated the effects of different NSCs on physiological responses, growth parameters, yield, and quality of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) in a vertical farming system within a greenhouse in Japan from May to August 2024. Four NSCs were tested: Enshi Shoho (control), Formula-1, Formula-2, and Formula-3. These formulations were based on nutrient absorption rates determined by high-pressure ion chromatography (HPIC) in a preliminary study. The results demonstrated significant variations in vegetative growth, physiological responses, and yield attributes among treatments. Formula-1, with a reduced NSC, exhibited increased leaf area, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, plant fresh weight, and dry weight. It also produced larger ovaries and fruits, increasing yield by 14.8% compared to the control. Additionally, Formula-1 showed higher Brix (12.00), lycopene content, and flesh thickness (154.26 mm), indicating early maturity due to higher sugar and lower acid content. Performance ranking was Formula-1 > Formula-3 > Control > Formula-2. Thus, Formula-1 was identified as the optimal NSC for maximizing watermelon growth, physiological efficiency, yield, and quality in hydroponic cultivation.

Indexed as

CitrullusHydroponicsNutrientsChlorophyllPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesChlorophyllNutrientsGreenhouse cultivationHydroponicsNutrient managementNutrient solutionSolution strengthWatermelon

Identifiers

PMID40676035
PMCPMC12271344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.