ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Geometric determinants of sinterless, low-temperature-processed 3D-nanoprinted glass.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Two-Photon Lithography of 3D Inorganic Microstructures: Glass, Ceramics, Metals, and Carbon.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Physics-Informed Optimization for the Sub-Feature-Scale Fabrication of Hollow Microneedles via Digital Light Processing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- A review of glass thermal reflow: method, device, and applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glass materials are essential for microsystems applications in fields ranging from optics and photonics to microfluidics and biomedicine, which has driven growing interest in additive manufacturing-or "three-dimensional (3D) printing"-to enable glass micro/nanotechnologies. Notably, the recent discovery that 3D-nanostructured fused silica glass components can be produced via "two-photon direct laser writing (DLW)" of hybrid organic-inorganic polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS)-based resins holds unique promise, particularly due to the advantages of sinterless, low-temperature (i.e., 650 °C) post-processing. At present, however, it remains unknown how implementing such methodologies to 3D print larger glass microstructures (e.g., with ≥25-µm-thick features) affects critical material properties, such as the ultimate optical and mechanical characteristics. To address this knowledge gap, here we investigate DLW-printed feature size as a key determinant of the optical and mechanical properties of POSS-based fused silica glass microstructures. Experiments for DLW-printed microlenses reveal comparable optical transparency for initial thicknesses up to 40 µm, but increasing to 60 µm significantly reduces light transmission from 87.87 ± 1.18% to 63.57 ± 5.10%. Similarly, compressive loading studies for hollow glass cylindrical microstructures show consistent behavior for initial DLW-printed wall thicknesses up to 30 µm, but significant performance degradation beyond-e.g., Young's modulus decreasing from 251.6 ± 71.9 to 99.7 ± 63.9 MPa for the 30 to 40 µm cases, respectively. As an exemplar with relevance to biomedical microinjection applications, we harness this new knowledge to DLW-print POSS-based glass microneedle arrays (MNAs) and demonstrate their ability to penetrate into a medium not possible using standard polymer MNAs. In combination, this study establishes critical optical and mechanical benchmarks that underlie the utility of DLW 3D-printed POSS-based fused silica glass microstructures in emerging applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.