Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675817›Full record

ArticleGenome research2025

Aggregation of recount3 RNA-seq data improves inference of consensus and tissue-specific gene coexpression networks.

Prashanthi Ravichandran, Princy Parsana, Rebecca Keener, Kasper D Hansen, Alexis Battle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prashanthi RavichandranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9364-175X
Princy ParsanaDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-9636
Rebecca KeenerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9031-6866
Kasper D HansenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-0687
Alexis BattleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA; ajbattle@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-627X

Funding

Modeling the dynamicimpact of rare and common genetic variation on gene expression anddiseaseR35GM139580 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BATTLE, ALEXIS · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Analysis of genomics datasets at a massive scaleR01GM121459 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HANSEN, KASPER DANIEL · 2017 to 2021
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121459NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene coexpression networks (GCNs) describe relationships among genes that maintain cellular identity and homeostasis. However, typical RNA-seq experiments often lack sufficient sample sizes for reliable GCN inference. recount3, a data set with 316,443 processed human RNA-seq samples, provides an opportunity to improve network reconstruction. However, GCN inference from public data is challenged by confounders and inconsistent labeling. To address this, we develop a pipeline to annotate samples based on cell-type composition. By comparing aggregation strategies, we find that regressing confounders within studies and prioritizing larger studies optimizes network reconstruction. We apply these findings to infer three consensus networks (universal, cancer, noncancer) and 27 context-specific networks. Central genes in consensus networks are enriched for evolutionarily constrained genes and ubiquitous biological pathways, whereas context-specific central nodes include tissue-specific transcription factors. The increased statistical power from data aggregation facilitates the derivation of variant annotations from context-specific networks, which are significantly enriched for complex-trait heritability independent of overlap with baseline functional genomic annotations. Although data aggregation led to strictly increasing held-out log-likelihood, we observe diminishing marginal improvements, suggesting that integrating complementary modalities, such as Hi-C and ChIP-seq, can further refine network reconstruction. Our approach outlines best practices for GCN inference and highlights both the strengths and limitations of data aggregation.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksRNA-SeqGene Expression ProfilingHumansOrgan SpecificitySequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID40675817
PMCPMC12401056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.