ArticleGenome research2025
Aggregation of recount3 RNA-seq data improves inference of consensus and tissue-specific gene coexpression networks.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Convergent coexpression reveals shared biological mechanisms underlying common and rare variant risk in six neuropsychiatric disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update ofAggregation of2024
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene coexpression networks (GCNs) describe relationships among genes that maintain cellular identity and homeostasis. However, typical RNA-seq experiments often lack sufficient sample sizes for reliable GCN inference. recount3, a data set with 316,443 processed human RNA-seq samples, provides an opportunity to improve network reconstruction. However, GCN inference from public data is challenged by confounders and inconsistent labeling. To address this, we develop a pipeline to annotate samples based on cell-type composition. By comparing aggregation strategies, we find that regressing confounders within studies and prioritizing larger studies optimizes network reconstruction. We apply these findings to infer three consensus networks (universal, cancer, noncancer) and 27 context-specific networks. Central genes in consensus networks are enriched for evolutionarily constrained genes and ubiquitous biological pathways, whereas context-specific central nodes include tissue-specific transcription factors. The increased statistical power from data aggregation facilitates the derivation of variant annotations from context-specific networks, which are significantly enriched for complex-trait heritability independent of overlap with baseline functional genomic annotations. Although data aggregation led to strictly increasing held-out log-likelihood, we observe diminishing marginal improvements, suggesting that integrating complementary modalities, such as Hi-C and ChIP-seq, can further refine network reconstruction. Our approach outlines best practices for GCN inference and highlights both the strengths and limitations of data aggregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.