ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Implementation of home blood pressure monitoring in preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elevated preoperative blood pressure (BP) is a common problem and often results in late surgery cancellation and wastage of theatre resources. High BP readings in the preoperative anaesthetic assessment clinic (PAAC) could be the result of the white coat effect (WCE) and may not reflect patients' baseline BP. A preliminary audit conducted in our hospital revealed a significant number of unnecessary referrals to the general practitioners (GPs) and the emergency department (ED) based on high BP readings in PAAC alone.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of WCE in elective surgical patients and develop a workflow to reduce unnecessary referrals and case cancellations.A multidisciplinary team established a new hypertension workflow by introducing home BP monitoring and involving internal medicine specialists in perioperative care. 214 patients with clinic BP higher than 160/90 mm Hg in PAAC were recruited. They were instructed to check their home BP twice a day with a machine on loan from PAAC and seek medical assistance if their home BP exceeded 160/90 mm Hg. WCE was diagnosed when the discrepancy between the average clinic BP and home BP exceeded 20/10 mm Hg.WCE was observed in 92.1% of patients (162/176, 95% CI 87.0 to 95.6) and 57.4% of those with WCE (57.4%, 95% CI 49.7 to 64.8) had normal home BP measurement. None of the patients had surgery cancelled due to high BP readings on the day of the operation, and the number of unnecessary GP/ED referrals was significantly reduced after implementation of the new workflow.The comprehensive perioperative workflow using home BP monitoring offers an effective and feasible method to detect WCE. This approach has saved healthcare resources and improved patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.