ArticleBMJ open2025
Effectiveness of predictive scoring systems in predicting mortality in relation to baseline kidney function in adult intensive care unit patients: a systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intensive Care Unit Scoring Systems' Performance in Patients with Pre-Existing Kidney Disease.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPredictive scoring systems support clinicians in decision-making by estimating the prognosis of patients in intensive care units (ICUs). However, there is limited evidence on the accuracy of these systems in predicting mortality and organ dysfunction in special populations. The aim of this review is to assess the performance of predictive scoring systems in forecasting mortality in adult ICU patients in relation to baseline kidney function. It is anticipated that the assessment of predictive scoring systems' performance and patient outcomes in this review may reveal information that will contribute to improve the quality of care and outcomes for special or under-represented ICU patient populations. It might also inform future research and contribute to the development of novel risk prediction models to address identified gaps or unanswered questions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will include only observational studies, as these allow us to assess the real-world performance of predictive scoring systems in ICU settings by examining the original validation studies. By excluding randomised trials, paediatric studies, case reports and machine learning-derived models, this review focuses on the direct practical use of the scoring systems in adult ICU patients. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus was conducted from database inception to 10 October 2024. The data will be extracted on study characteristics, patient outcomes and performance metrics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will analyse data from previously published studies; no ethical approval is required. All data that will be included in the analysis will be publicly available and will be included in the final manuscript. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will also be presented at seminars and conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024611547.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.