ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025
More Power for Less Money: Statistical, Power, and Cost Analyses That Account for Intracluster Correlation in Experiments with Same-Group Cage Mates.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In experiments with cohoused animals, outcome variables can become correlated among cage mates. This is called intracluster correlation. When cage mates are all of the same group, the experiment is similar to a cluster randomized trial in human studies. Intracluster correlation in same-group cage mate experiments is a type of pseudoreplication, and ignoring it in statistical analyses increases false-positive results. Herein, we provide a tutorial on how to account for intracluster correlation in statistical analyses. Specifically, this is done by including cage identifiers as an independent variable in a linear mixed model, a type of ANOVA. Because power analyses must be based on the planned statistical analyses, we also include effect size calculations and sample size calculations (types of power analyses) in the tutorial. Effect size and sample size calculations help assure regulatory committees, such as IACUCs, granting agencies, and journals, that experiments are properly powered. These calculations will show that designing experiments to have more cages and fewer animals per cage is more efficient than fewer cages with more animals per cage. This statistical efficiency, which means more power, can be translated into reduced animal numbers, one of the 3Rs (replace, reduce, refine) of animal research. We then perform cost analyses and show how the costs of more cages with fewer animals overall are often less expensive than the costs of fewer cages with more animals overall. Altogether, accounting for intracluster correlation in the experiment design and analysis of same-group cage mate experiments results in fewer statistical errors, reduced costs, and fewer animals. Finally, analyses are demonstrated using JASP, a free, open-source, user-friendly statistical software, and provide R and SAS code to perform the analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.