Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675595›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Refining In-Cage Enrichment for Specialized Mouse Scenarios.

Stephanie Oldham, Emily Minton, Michael Ford, Heather Phariss, Xiaokang Luo, Robin Kastenmayer, Erin Straley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie OldhamAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.
Emily MintonAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.
Michael FordAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.
Heather PharissAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.
Xiaokang LuoData Sciences and Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, Biopharmaceutical R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Robin KastenmayerAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.
Erin StraleyAnimal Science & Technologies, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland; and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental enrichment is a critical component of a high-quality animal care and use program to provide opportunities for species-specific behaviors and redirect abnormal repetitive behaviors. We used a scoring system to review our enrichment for singly housed mice to assess usage of supplied items. Following the confirmation of utilization of the selected enrichment, we applied the scoring system to address 2 cases of abnormal behavior. Repetitive food shredding in CD-1 mice was reduced by both manzanita sticks and running wheels; however, manzanita sticks were selected for operational ease. Focal auricular trauma associated with ear tags in BALB/c mice was decreased when gnawing items were provided, thus slowing the deterioration of ear tag condition. Scoring for all 3 studies focused on use of the enrichment, incorporation into the nest, or reduction of abnormal repetitive behavior. The development of a scoring system permits the objective assessment and selection of enrichment for unique scenarios, thus enhancing animal welfare and permitting a standardized way to evaluate enrichment for specialized projects.

Indexed as

DIO, diet-induced obeseKO, knockout

Identifiers

PMID40675595
PMCPMC12532147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.