Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675588›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Rodent Pathogen Detection via Testing of Soiled Nesting Material.

David M Kurtz, Lisa Angermeier, Maximilian Chisolm, Michael Johnston, Tanya Whiteside, Jacqueline Locklear, Min Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David M KurtzQuality Assurance Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Lisa AngermeierVeterinary Medical Section, Comparative Medicine Branch, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Maximilian ChisolmHigh Point University, High Point, North Carolina; and.
Michael JohnstonQuality Assurance Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Tanya WhitesideQuality Assurance Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Jacqueline LocklearQuality Assurance Laboratory, Comparative Medicine Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Min ShiBiostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Murine pathogens affect laboratory animal health and research outcomes, and the prevention of pathogen incursion or the elimination of pathogen outbreaks is paramount. To this end, sensitive methods for pathogen detection are continually being developed and improved. Environmental health monitoring has become a popular and sensitive method for pathogen detection. Published methods for environmental sampling include the collection and testing of exhaust air filters, exhaust air duct swabs, and swabs or filter media placement in empty cages with soiled bedding. Our study tested soiled, cotton nesting material (Nestlet™) in occupied cages for the detection of nucleic acid from certain, high-prevalence, murine pathogens. Nesting material from cages housing mice positive for mouse norovirus, Helicobacter spp., and Rodentibacter heylii consistently tested positive for these agents. In addition, nesting material from cages housing naïve mice to which soiled bedding from the infected cages was transferred tested positive for these agents more often than testing the mice directly. This study concluded that testing of particulate material (for example, dust) from soiled nesting material is a sensitive detection method for certain, high-prevalence murine pathogens.

Indexed as

BAPs, blood agar plates (tryptic soy agar with 5% sheep blood)EDT, exhaust dust testingEHM, environmental health monitoringGLMM, generalized linear mixed modelsIVC, individually ventilated cageMNV, mouse norovirusNIEHS, National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesOP, oropharyngealSBS, soiled bedding sentinelsSFSB, sentinel-free soiled beddingTNA, total nucleic acid

Identifiers

PMID40675588
PMCPMC12532122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.