Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675579›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2025

Impact of Sonication Fluid Cultures on Prosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis and Management: A Microbiology-Driven Evaluation Using Infectious Diseases Society of America and European Bone and Joint Infection Society Criteria.

Anas Zouitni, P Koen Bos, Marius Vogel, Peter Croughs, Lennert Slobbe, Paul-Emile Claus, Jakob van Oldenrijk, Ewout S Veltman, Erlangga Yusuf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of sonication on staphylococcal and gram-negative biofilms relevant to prosthetic joint infections: an in vitro study.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anas ZouitniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
P Koen BosDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marius VogelDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter CroughsDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lennert SlobbeDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul-Emile ClausDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Jakob van OldenrijkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout S VeltmanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erlangga YusufDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost studies investigating the role of sonication fluid culture on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) focused on diagnostic accuracy, without assessing its potential impact on patient management. This study aims to evaluate how the use of sonication fluid culture may alter the diagnosis and management of PJI.

methodsIncluded were 429 patients (mean age [SD], 68 [11] year; 65% male) who underwent explantation of a knee or hip prosthesis due to suspected PJI or aseptic causes. Because the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) PJI criteria do not include sonication in the diagnostic definition, we compared sonication fluid culture results with intraoperative tissue cultures patient-per-patient. In contrast, the European Bone and Joint Society (EBJIS) criteria include both sonication and tissue cultures. For EBJIS-confirmed criteria, we calculated the proportion of cases meeting the sonication fluid culture criterion of >50 colony-forming units (CFU)/ ml, and the number of cases where sonication identified additional microorganisms than tissues.

resultsAmong 95 PJI cases defined by IDSA criteria, sonication fluid culture would not alter patient management in 61 (64.2%) cases, as findings were fully concordant with tissue cultures. In 8 (8.4%) cases, sonication detected an additional virulent microorganism that could influence antibiotic selection. According to EBJIS criteria, 113 cases were classified as confirmed; 50 (44.2%) met the definition based solely on a positive sonication fluid culture >50 CFU/ml. In 10 of these 50 patients (20%), sonication influenced antibiotic selection by identifying additional low-virulence microorganisms.

conclusionsSonication fluid culture may influence clinical management in approximately 8% to 20% of PJI cases.

Indexed as

Microbiological TechniquesProsthesis-Related InfectionsSonicationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedantibiotic choicediagnosismicrobiologyprosthetic joint infectionsonication

Identifiers

PMID40675579
PMCPMC12728276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.