Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675572›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2025

Multicenter Analysis of the Attributable Diarrhea Risk and Odds Ratios of Pathogens in Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta) Using Multiplex PCR Gastrointestinal Panel Testing and Conventional Fecal Culture.

Andrew J Haertel, Samuel McCoy, Colleen S McCoy, Marcelo Delos Reyes, Heidi Palmer, Paul-Michael Sosa, Madeline C Burke, Massiel Melendez, Peter B Nham, Gregory Timmel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Incidence and Pathogenicity ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Andrew J Haertel1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Samuel McCoy1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Colleen S McCoy2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Marcelo Delos Reyes1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Heidi Palmer1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Paul-Michael Sosa2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Madeline C Burke1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Massiel Melendez2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Peter B Nham2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Gregory Timmel2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
JoAnn Yee2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Koen K A Van Rompay2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
Jeffrey A Roberts2California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, California; and.
L Drew Martin1Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Viral Testing CoreU42OD010990 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Rhonda S Oates, Jeffrey A Roberts · 2012 to 2026
$20.1M
Viral Testing CoreU42OD010426 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Haertel, Lauren Drew Martin · 2013 to 2026
$6.0M
NIH HHS P51 OD011092NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIH HHS U42 OD010426NIH HHS U42 OD010990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diarrhea remains the largest disease burden of rhesus macaques in research. Often, the urgency to initiate targeted treatment needs to be balanced with the time needed to accurately diagnose the causative agent. Multiplex PCR gastrointestinal panel testing was compared with conventional fecal culture in a case control study of diarrhea in rhesus macaques. Animals enrolled in the study were from 2 different institutions and 2 different housing environments. Detection of Shigella and Yersinia by fecal culture had higher odds ratios of diarrhea and higher attributable diarrhea risk than did their detection by PCR testing. Multiplex PCR testing had a wider scope of detectable pathogens. The findings of this study provide odds ratios that indicate significant associations between pathogens and diarrhea and attributable diarrhea risk of pathogens that can be ranked relative to each pathogen to provide a guide to clinicians when choosing pathogens to treat with antimicrobials. We have shown that the attributable diarrhea risk of detected pathogens differs depending on which diagnostic method is used, and that our understanding of their detection should be reevaluated when new diagnostics are introduced.

Indexed as

AR, population attributable risk for diarrheaCNPRC, California National Primate Research CenterEIEC, enteroinvasive Escherichia coliEPEC, enteropathogenic Escherichia coliGI, gastrointestinalNHP, nonhuman primateONPRC, Oregon National Primate Research CenterOR, odds ratio

Identifiers

PMID40675572
PMCPMC12662756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.