Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675520›Full record

ArticlePharmacological research2025

Telmisartan reverses hepatic steatosis via PCK1 upregulation: A novel PPAR-independent mechanism in experimental models of MASLD.

Roger Bentanachs, Patricia Ramírez-Carrasco, Bianca Braster, Anastasia Emmanouilidou, Endrina Mujica, Maite Rodrigo-Calvo, Cristina Rodríguez, Núria Roglans, Marcel den Hoed, Juan C Laguna and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roger BentanachsDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine IBUB, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Patricia Ramírez-CarrascoDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine IBUB, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Bianca BrasterDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75105, Sweden; SciLifeLab, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.
Anastasia EmmanouilidouDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75105, Sweden; SciLifeLab, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.
Endrina MujicaDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75105, Sweden; SciLifeLab, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.
Maite Rodrigo-CalvoPathology Department, Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona 08036, Spain.
Cristina RodríguezInstitut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Barcelona 08041, Spain; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Cardiovascular diseases (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain.
Núria RoglansDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine IBUB, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Marcel den HoedDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75105, Sweden; SciLifeLab, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.
Juan C LagunaDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine IBUB, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.
Marta AlegretDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid 28029, Spain; Institute of Biomedicine IBUB, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain. Electronic address: alegret@ub.edu.

Funding

The next iteration of the AMP-T2D Knowledge PortalUM1DK105554 · NIDDK · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BOEHNKE, MICHAEL L, BURTT, NOEL P · 2020 to 2025
$18.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS UM1 DK105554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug combination and repurposing are potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Here, we have demonstrated that, in rats, both pemafibrate and telmisartan reverse hepatic steatosis induced by a high-fat, high-fructose diet. Pemafibrate attenuated liver steatosis via a PPARα-mediated increase in fatty acid catabolism, while the antisteatotic response to telmisartan did not rely on PPAR modulation. Our results in rats and in a zebrafish larva model of liver lipid accumulation suggest that part of telmisartan's antisteatotic effects are driven through the blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, along with a reduction in the expression of several lipogenic genes, which also contributes to some extent. Telmisartan's response is mediated by the upregulation of hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1) expression. Liver metabolomic analysis revealed that by increasing PCK1, telmisartan diverted the metabolic flux of fructose from lipid towards glucose synthesis, which was subsequently fueled to the polyol pathway, thereby preserving glucose homeostasis. Moreover, telmisartan increased the hepatic levels of spermine and spermidine, which may counteract the putative detrimental effects caused by the accumulation of metabolites of the polyol route. Targeting different intrahepatic pathways, both PPAR-dependent and independent, the combination of pemafibrate and telmisartan, each at half the individual dose, was equally effective as the full dose of either drug alone to reduce liver lipid accumulation in the rat model. Our findings support the repurposing potential of these drugs, with the additional advantage of addressing both hepatic and cardiometabolic MASLD-associated complications.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersFatty LiverPhosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (GTP)TelmisartanAnimalsDiet, High-FatDisease Models, AnimalFructoseLipid MetabolismLiverMalePPAR alphaRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUp-RegulationZebrafishAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersFructosePhosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase (GTP)PPAR alphaTelmisartanAngiotensin receptor blockersGluconeogenesisLiver steatosisMetabolomicsPhosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1PPAR

Identifiers

PMID40675520
PMCPMC13226445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.