Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40675054›Full record

ArticleCognition2025

Does overnight memory consolidation support next-day learning?

Anna Á V Guttesen, Marcus O Harrington, M Gareth Gaskell, Scott A Cairney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna Á V GuttesenDepartment of Psychology, University of York, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Marcus O HarringtonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, UK; School of Psychology, University of East Anglia, UK.
M Gareth GaskellDepartment of Psychology, University of York, UK; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, UK.
Scott A CairneyDepartment of Psychology, University of York, UK; York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, UK. Electronic address: scott.cairney@york.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020208/1Royal Society Research Grant RG/R1/241079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep supports memory consolidation and next-day learning. The Active Systems model of consolidation proposes that sleep facilitates a shift in the memory retrieval network from hippocampus to neocortex in service of long-term storage. Accordingly, overnight consolidation may support efficient next-day learning. We tested this hypothesis across two preregistered behavioural experiments. In both experiments, participants learned a set of word pairs and recall was assessed before and after a 12-h delay containing overnight sleep or daytime wakefulness. Participants then learned and were immediately tested on a new set of word pairs. Word pair retention was better after the delay of sleep than wakefulness, suggesting a benefit of sleep for memory consolidation, but there was no sleep-related learning advantage for the new set of word pairs. Sleep-associated consolidation was not associated with next-day learning in our preregistered analyses, although a significant positive relationship with learning did emerge in an exploratory analysis that accounted for performance at pre-sleep recall. Taken together, our findings provide exploratory evidence that overnight consolidation may be linked to new learning, with pre-sleep retrieval performance influencing the magnitude of this relationship.

Indexed as

LearningMemory ConsolidationMental RecallSleepAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleWakefulnessYoung Adult12–12 designEncoding capacityMemory consolidationOpen dataPaired-associates learningPreregisteredSleep

Identifiers

PMID40675054
PMCPMC12332499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.