Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674941›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2025

Alzheimer disease: Amyloid peptide controversies and challenges of anti-Aβ immunotherapy.

Najlaa Hamed Almohmadi, Hayder M Al-Kuraishy, Ali K Albuhadily, Ali I Al-Gareeb, Ahmed M Abdelaziz, Athanasios Alexiou, Marios Papadakis, Gaber El-Saber Batiha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prediction of Episodic Memory With Multiomics Scores.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Role of Monoclonal Antibodies in Alzheimer's Disease: Successes, Failures, and Future Directions.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Najlaa Hamed AlmohmadiClinical Nutrition Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Hayder M Al-KuraishyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali K AlbuhadilyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali I Al-GareebDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Medicine, College of Medicine, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq; Jabir ibn Hayyan Medical University, Najaf, Iraq.
Ahmed M AbdelazizDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sinai University - Arish Branch, Arish, Egypt. Electronic address: ahmed.abdelaziz@su.edu.eg.
Athanasios AlexiouUniversity Centre for Research & Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, India; Department of Research & Development, Funogen, Athens, Greece.
Marios PapadakisUniversity Hospital Witten-Herdecke, University of Witten, Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany. Electronic address: drmariospapadakis@gmail.com.
Gaber El-Saber BatihaDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt. Electronic address: dr_gaber_batiha@vetmed.dmu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease marked by the accumulation of extracellular β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles containing tau protein. Given the relentless deterioration in AD, strategies to slow its progression often focus on inhibiting Aβ production or aggregation. However, numerous clinical trials targeting Aβ in later disease stages have shown limited success in reversing cognitive decline, potentially due to intervening too late in the disease course. Emerging evidence suggests that addressing Aβ pathology during the earliest phases of AD, before the occurrence of neuronal damage, may be beneficial for preserving cognitive function. Thus, therapeutic approaches aimed at reducing Aβ levels, such as anti-Aβ antibodies, are likely to yield greater benefits when implemented early in the disease trajectory. Such evidence underscores the rationale for prioritizing early-stage interventions in AD drug development. However, disrupting the physiological role of Aβ, which plays a role in normal brain function, might inadvertently worsen clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for nuanced therapeutic strategies. Therefore, this review aims to explore the dual aspects of Aβ biology: its natural role in the brain and the potential of anti-Aβ immunotherapy, particularly targeting amyloid plaques, as a promising avenue for modifying AD progression when timed appropriately. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review highlights that β-amyloid (Aβ) has a dual role in both supporting synaptic plasticity and memory via nicotinic receptor activation and driving Alzheimer disease neuropathology, emphasizing that early-stage Aβ-targeted immunotherapy may prevent cognitive decline while preserving the neuroprotective functions of Aβ, thereby refining therapeutic strategies and advancing understanding of the complex role of Aβ in neural health and disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesImmunotherapyAnimalsBrainHumansPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAlzheimer diseaseAnti-Aβ immunotherapyβ-amyloid

Identifiers

PMID40674941
PMCPMC12489360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.