Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674738›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2025

Utility of IDH1/2 mutations as biomarkers for detection of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Emma L Boertjes, Christian M Vonk, François G Kavelaars, Marie Engvall, Sofia Nordin, Lisanne Beugelink, Melissa Rijken, Jolinda M L Konijnenburg, Jurjen Versluis, Bob Löwenberg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SuperRCA assay ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma L BoertjesDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-2520-9817
Christian M VonkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-4321-9104
François G KavelaarsDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie EngvallRarity Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7394-9191
Sofia NordinRarity Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lisanne BeugelinkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-9338
Melissa RijkenDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-5781-3622
Jolinda M L KonijnenburgDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jurjen VersluisDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2372-1663
Bob LöwenbergDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-5217
Peter J M ValkDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMolecular measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been established for only a few specific markers: mutant NPM1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD). Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) are present in ∼20% of patients with AML. However, validation of mutant IDH1/2 MRD has been hampered by cohort size as well as the availability of highly sensitive and specific MRD detection assays. Here, we comprehensively investigate the impact of persistent IDH1/2 mutations in complete remission after intensive chemotherapy in a cohort of 163 newly diagnosed patients with IDH-mutant AML, enrolled in Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology-Oncology and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research clinical trials, using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach, targeting all hot spot mutations in IDH1 (R132) and IDH2 (R140 and R172). The high sensitivity (10-4) as well as the levels of persistent IDH1/2 mutations detected by the NGS-based approach were confirmed by an independent super rolling circle amplification assay. We demonstrate that the risk of relapse was significantly increased in patients with AML with measurable persistent IDH2 mutations (P = .027; subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 2.34) but not in patients with persistent mutant IDH1 (P = .591; SHR, 0.80). Moreover, the association of persistence of mutant IDH2 and increased risk of relapse was most pronounced in patients with mutant IDH2 AML without concomitant NPM1 mutations or FLT3-ITD (P = .011; SHR, 5.29). Thus, mutant IDH2 appears as a potentially useful novel molecular MRD marker with prognostic significance in AML.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationNeoplasm, ResidualAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNucleophosminPrognosisYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseNPM1 protein, humanNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID40674738
PMCPMC12506537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.