ArticleBlood advances2025
Utility of IDH1/2 mutations as biomarkers for detection of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- SuperRCA assay ofThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- [Efficacy and safety of ivosidenib-based therapy in 16 patients with IDH1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Dynamics of IDH1/2 mutated clones in acute myeloid leukemia challenge their use as universal MRD markers.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- IDH1- and IDH2-mutated myeloid neoplasms: mutational pattern, clonal hierarchy, and the role in AML transformation.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of combined digital PCR and multiparametric flow cytometry monitoring MRD in non-transplant acute myeloid leukemia.Journal of hematopathology · 2026Observational
- Ultra-Sensitive Mutation Detection Technology in Myeloid Neoplasms: New Tools for Patient Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractMolecular measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been established for only a few specific markers: mutant NPM1 and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD). Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) are present in ∼20% of patients with AML. However, validation of mutant IDH1/2 MRD has been hampered by cohort size as well as the availability of highly sensitive and specific MRD detection assays. Here, we comprehensively investigate the impact of persistent IDH1/2 mutations in complete remission after intensive chemotherapy in a cohort of 163 newly diagnosed patients with IDH-mutant AML, enrolled in Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology-Oncology and Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research clinical trials, using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach, targeting all hot spot mutations in IDH1 (R132) and IDH2 (R140 and R172). The high sensitivity (10-4) as well as the levels of persistent IDH1/2 mutations detected by the NGS-based approach were confirmed by an independent super rolling circle amplification assay. We demonstrate that the risk of relapse was significantly increased in patients with AML with measurable persistent IDH2 mutations (P = .027; subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR), 2.34) but not in patients with persistent mutant IDH1 (P = .591; SHR, 0.80). Moreover, the association of persistence of mutant IDH2 and increased risk of relapse was most pronounced in patients with mutant IDH2 AML without concomitant NPM1 mutations or FLT3-ITD (P = .011; SHR, 5.29). Thus, mutant IDH2 appears as a potentially useful novel molecular MRD marker with prognostic significance in AML.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.