Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674722›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Detecting Conversation Topics in Recruitment Calls of African American Participants to the All of Us Research Program Using Machine Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.

Priscilla Pemu, Michael Prude, Atuarra McCaslin, Elizabeth Ojemakinde, Christopher Awad, Kelechi Igwe, Anny Rodriguez, Jasmine Foriest, Muhammed Idris

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priscilla Pemu *Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2443-6613
Michael Prude *Clinical Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-8424-5893
Atuarra McCaslin *Clinical Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-2216-6719
Elizabeth Ojemakinde *Clinical Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-4069
Christopher AwadWexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Colombus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-3076
Kelechi IgweClinical Research Center, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-7767-2210
Anny RodriguezDepartment of Public Health Education, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5863-1129
Jasmine ForiestHuman-Centered Computing, School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5265-9574
Muhammed Idris *Department of Medicine, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3899-3728

Funding

SouthEast Enrollment Center (SEEC) OT2OD026551 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, COLON, VIVIAN · 2018 to 2023
$62.8M
Urgent Competitive Revision to Existing NIH Grants and Cooperative Agreements (Urgent Supplement - Clinical Trial Optional)U24MD015970 · NIMHD · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Sandra Perreira Chang, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2020 to 2026
$20.6M
NIH HHS OT2 OD026551NIMHD NIH HHS U24 MD015970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvancements in science and technology can exacerbate health disparities, particularly when there is a lack of diversity in clinical research, which limits the benefits of innovations for underrepresented communities. Programs like the All of Us Research Program (AoURP) are actively working to address this issue by ensuring that underrepresented populations are represented in biomedical research, promoting equitable participation, and advancing health outcomes for all. African American communities have been particularly underrepresented in clinical research, often due to historical instances of research misconduct, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, which have deeply impacted trust and willingness to participate in research studies. With the US population becoming increasingly diverse, it is crucial that clinical research studies reflect this diversity to improve health outcomes. However, limited data and small sample sizes in qualitative studies on the inclusion of underrepresented groups hinder progress in this area.

objectiveThe goal of this paper is to analyze recruitment conversations between research assistants (RAs) and potential participants in the AoURP to identify key topics that influence enrollment. By examining these interactions, we aim to provide insights that can improve engagement strategies and recruitment practices for underrepresented groups in biomedical research.

methodsOur study design was an observational, retrospective approach using machine learning for content analysis. Specifically, we used structural topic modeling to identify and compare latent topics of conversation in recruitment calls by Morehouse School of Medicine RAs between February 2021 and April 2022 by estimating expected topic proportions in the corpus as a function of enrollment and participation in AoURP.

resultsIn total, our model estimated 45 topics of which 12 coherent topics were identified. Notable topics, that were more likely to occur in conversations between RAs and participants that enrolled and participated, include closing or following up to schedule an appointment, COVID-19 protocols for in-person visits, explaining precision medicine and the need for representation, and working through objections, including concerns about costs, insurance, care changes, and health fears. Topics among potential participants who did not enroll include technical challenges and describing physical measurement visits (eg, collection of basic physical data, such as height, weight, and blood pressure).

conclusionsUsing an approach that leverages machine learning to identify topical structure and themes with limited human subjectivity is a promising strategy to identify gaps in, and opportunities to improve, the recruitment of underserved communities into clinical trials.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBlack or African AmericanCommunicationMachine LearningPatient SelectionAdultFemaleHumansMaleUnited Statesclinical trialsdiversityprecision medicinerecruitmenttrust

Identifiers

PMID40674722
PMCPMC12314466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.