Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674714›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Deep Learning-Based Precision Cropping of Eye Regions in Strabismus Photographs: Algorithm Development and Validation Study for Workflow Optimization.

Dawen Wu, Yanfei Li, Zeyi Yang, Teng Yin, Xiaohang Chen, Jingyu Liu, Wenyi Shang, Bin Xie, Guoyuan Yang, Haixian Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dawen Wu *Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4938-3044
Yanfei Li *Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4563-7515
Zeyi YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2327-9082
Teng YinMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1254-6705
Xiaohang ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-3607
Jingyu LiuMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7153-397X
Wenyi ShangMachine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5148-9358
Bin XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1144-9900
Guoyuan Yang *Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7314-836X
Haixian Zhang *Machine Intelligence Laboratory, College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9821-508X
Longqian Liu *Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Xiang (Alley), Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, China, 86 18980601759.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-4625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional ocular gaze photograph preprocessing, relying on manual cropping and head tilt correction, is time-consuming and inconsistent, limiting artificial intelligence (AI) model development and clinical application. Objective: This study aimed to address these challenges using an advanced preprocessing algorithm to enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and standardization of eye region cropping for clinical workflows and AI data preprocessing. Methods: This retrospective and prospective cross-sectional study utilized 5832 images from 648 inpatients and outpatients, capturing 3 gaze positions under diverse conditions, including obstructions and varying distances. The preprocessing algorithm, based on a rotating bounding box detection framework, was trained and evaluated using precision, recall, and mean average precision (mAP) at various intersections over union thresholds. A 5-fold cross-validation was performed on an inpatient dataset, with additional testing on an independent outpatient dataset and an external cross-population dataset of 500 images from the IMDB-WIKI collection, representing diverse ethnicities and ages. Expert validation confirmed alignment with clinical standards across 96 images (48 images from a Chinese dataset of patients with strabismus and 48 images from IMDB-WIKI). Gradient-weighted class activation mapping heatmaps were used to assess model interpretability. A control experiment with 5 optometry specialists compared manual and automated cropping efficiency. Downstream task validation involved preprocessing 1000 primary gaze photographs using the Dlib toolkit, faster region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN; both without head tilt correction), and our model (with correction), evaluating the impact of head tilt correction via the vision transformer strabismus screening network through 5-fold cross-validation. Results: The model achieved exceptional performance across datasets: on the 5-fold cross-validation set, it recorded a mean precision of 1.000 (95% CI 1.000-1.000), recall of 1.000 (95% CI 1.000-1.000), mAP50 of 0.995 (95% CI 0.995-0.995), and mAP95 of 0.893 (95% CI 0.870-0.918); on the internal independent test set, precision and recall were 1.000, with mAP50 of 0.995 and mAP95 of 0.801; and on the external cross-population test set, precision and recall were 1.000, with mAP50 of 0.937 and mAP95 of 0.792. The control experiment reduced image preparation time from 10 hours for manual cropping of 900 photos to 30 seconds with the automated model. Downstream strabismus screening task validation showed our model (with head tilt correction) achieving an area under the curve of 0.917 (95% CI 0.901-0.933), surpassing Dlib-toolkit and faster R-CNN (both without head tilt correction) with an area under the curve of 0.856 (P=.02) and 0.884 (P=.05), respectively. Heatmaps highlighted core ocular focus, aligning with head tilt directions. Conclusions: This study delivers an AI-driven platform featuring a preprocessing algorithm that automates eye region cropping, correcting head tilt variations to improve image quality for AI development and clinical use. Integrated with electronic archives and patient-physician interaction, it enhances workflow efficiency, ensures telemedicine privacy, and supports ophthalmological research and strabismus care.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEyeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotographyStrabismusAdultAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesWorkflowAI management systemartificial intelligenceclinical workflowimage preprocessingocular alignment

Identifiers

PMID40674714
PMCPMC12293638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.