Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674655›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2025

Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Settings: A Scoping Review.

Christine M Kava, Judith Lee Smith, Emily K Kobernik, Jan M Eberth, Cynthia French, Sarah H Nash, Whitney E Zahnd, Ingrid J Hall

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christine M KavaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S107-4, Atlanta, GA 30341 (tqz1@cdc.gov).
Judith Lee SmithDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emily K KobernikDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jan M EberthDrexel University, Department of Health Management and Policy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Cynthia FrenchDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sarah H NashUniversity of Iowa, Department of Epidemiology, Iowa City.
Whitney E ZahndUniversity of Iowa, Department of Health Management and Policy, Iowa City.
Ingrid J HallDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An estimated 6,000 preventable cancer deaths - including from colorectal cancer (CRC) - occurred in rural America in 2022. Screening can prevent CRC or identify disease at earlier stages when it is more treatable. However, national estimates for CRC screening lag behind Healthy People 2030 objectives. In rural settings, barriers to screening are unique and persistent. Methods: We performed a scoping review to describe the types and effectiveness of interventions to increase CRC screening in primarily rural settings. We included US-based studies published during January 2010 through May 2024. Interventions were categorized according to US Community Preventive Services Task Force-recommended strategies for multicomponent interventions. Results: Of 508 unique publications identified, 36 met inclusion criteria. Most studies were multicomponent interventions (n = 34). Most studies were associated with an increase in CRC screening uptake. The most common intervention approaches were client reminders (eg, telephone reminders about screening) (n = 25), small media (eg, pamphlets) (n = 25), and reducing structural barriers to screening (eg, patient navigation) (n = 24). Over half (n = 21) of studies reported using a theory, framework, or research approach to inform intervention development, implementation, or evaluation. Six studies (17%) included cost evaluations. The studies included in this review represented less than half of all US states. Conclusion: This scoping review provides insight into CRC screening intervention implementation in rural settings. The limited geographic representation of the interventions included in our review may highlight an opportunity to improve implementation and dissemination of effective CRC screening interventions in rural settings to reduce CRC incidence and death.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMass ScreeningRural PopulationHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40674655
PMCPMC12335313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.