Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674554›Full record

ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2025

Spotlight on the Artifacts in Next-Generation Sequencing in PGT-A: Reason for High Mosaicism Reporting.

Neeta Singh, Ankita Sethi, Ritu Gupta, Lata Rani, Monika Saini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neeta SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ankita SethiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ritu GuptaLaboratory Oncology Unit, Dr.B.R.A. IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi.
Lata RaniGenomics Lab, Centralized Core Research Facility (CCRF), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Monika SainiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study investigates artifacts in Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) used for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) and their contribution to the high rates of mosaicism reporting. Modern PGT-A can detect mosaicism by analyzing copy number variations (CNVs) in embryonic biopsies, yet distinguishing true mosaicism from artifacts remains challenging. In a cohort of 22 embryos, NGS profiles revealed recurring artifacts on chromosomes 7, 11, 16, and 19. These artifacts likely result from errors in DNA amplification for NGS library preparation, potentially leading to false mosaicism diagnosis. The study utilized DNA extracted from trophectoderm biopsies, spent culture media, and whole blastocyst samples, with CNV analysis performed using BlueFuse Multi software. Quality control parameters such as DLR noise, read count, and quality score were considered, confirming that technical inconsistencies contribute to the observed artifacts. Findings align with prior research, suggesting the need for improved NGS protocols to minimize these errors. Enhanced internal validation and adoption of new technologies could reduce false-positive rates and improve clinical decision-making in PGT-A.

Indexed as

AneuploidyArtifactsGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMosaicismPreimplantation DiagnosisDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansPregnancyartifactsmosaicismnext-generation sequencingPGT-A

Identifiers

PMID40674554
PMCPMC12469320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.