ArticlePloS one2025
Frequency domain manipulation of multiple copy-move forgery in digital image forensics.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Copy move forgery is a type of image forgery in which a portion of the original image is copied and pasted in a new location on the same image. The consistent illumination and noise pattern make this kind of forgery more difficult to detect. In copy-move forgery detection, conventional approaches are generally effective at identifying simple multiple copy-move forgeries. However, the conventional approaches and deep learning approaches often fall short in detecting multiple forgeries when transformations are applied to the copied regions. Motivated from these findings, a transform domain method for generating and analyzing multiple copy-move forgeries is proposed in this paper. This method utilizes the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to decompose the original and patch image into approximate (low frequency) and detail coefficients (high frequency). The patch image approximate and details coefficients are inserted into the corresponding positions of the original image wavelet coefficients. The inverse DWT (IDWT) reconstructs the processed image planes after modification which simulates the multiple copy move forgery. In addition, this approach is tested by resizing the region of interest with varying patch sizes resulting in an interesting set of outcomes when evaluated against existing state-of-the-art techniques. This evaluation allows us to identify gaps in existing approaches and suggest improvements for creating more robust detection techniques for multiple copy-move forgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.