ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Robust single-trial decoding of physical self-motion from hemodynamic signals in the brain measured by functional ultrasound imaging.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in neuroprostheses: interfaces, materials, and applications.Nano convergence · 2026Review
- A hemispheric decoding principle for vestibular heading perception in the posterior sylvian area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Robust single-trial decoding of physical self-motion from hemodynamic signals in the brain measured by functional ultrasound imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical self-motion frequently happens in daily life, during which our vestibular system is critical in various important functions including balance and visual stability maintenance, postural and motor control, locomotion, spatial perception, and path integration-based navigation. Conventional noninvasive methods for studying vestibular functions include functional MRI (fMRI) that conveniently measures brain-wide signals; however, subjects are required to be physically restricted in the scanner. In such cases, caloric or galvanic vestibular stimulation is applied to stimulate peripheral vestibular organs, suffering a loss of precise stimulation of peripheral vestibular organs as during physical motion conditions. In this study, we adopted functional ultrasound (fUS) imaging, a newly emerging minimally invasive technique with high spatiotemporal resolution, to measure vestibular related signals in primates under passive, physical self-motion conditions that selectively activate vestibular organs. We found that robust fUS signals were evoked in brain-wide regions. While many areas overlapped with those previously reported by fMRI or electrophysiology, significant activations were also seen in areas that were not clearly identified previously including area 5, 1-2, M1, V3A, and 7 m. Importantly, using a linear discriminant analysis algorithm, physical self-motion information, including both translation directions, and translation-vs.-rotation, could be reliably decoded from fUS signals on a single-trial basis. In addition to vestibular-related activity, many areas also exhibited visual-motion response, indicating possible multisensory interactions. Our findings suggest that fUS imaging holds a promising tool for studying vestibular functions in tasks under physical self-motion conditions, as well as interactions with visual or motor systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.