Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674412›Full record

ArticleJournal of periodontology2026

Radiographic changes in the maxillary sinus following closed sinus augmentation.

Jaret O Simonsen, Michael P Mills, Brian L Mealey, Lea El Hachem, Hassem Geha, Kerri Font, Charles A Powell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06296459 (Radiographic Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Following Closed Sinus Augmentation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06296459 nacompletednot on this map

Radiographic Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Following Closed Sinus Augmentation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioRan2022 to 2024Enrolled25ConditionsDental ImplantArms3D R100 scanner, Conventional Radiograph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaret O SimonsenDepartment of Periodontics, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Michael P MillsDepartment of Periodontics, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Brian L MealeyDepartment of Periodontics, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Lea El HachemDepartment of Periodontics, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Hassem GehaDepartment of Comprehensive Dentistry, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Kerri Font
Charles A PowellDepartment of Periodontics, UT Health San Antonio School of Dentistry, San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging in detecting radiographic and morphological graft changes compared to traditional 2-dimensional (2D) imaging. Additionally, the study aims to assess the distribution of graft material and the extent of resorption occurring between baseline and 6 months post-implant placement following transcrestal sinus augmentation.

methodsThis study employed a transcrestal approach utilizing an osseodensification protocol for sinus augmentation with mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. Immediately post-operatively, a standardized periapical radiograph (PA) was taken using a standardized paralleling device with bite registration material. Furthermore, a low-volume cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiograph was obtained. Following a 6-month healing period, both radiographs were repeated for analysis and comparison to baseline parameters.

resultsA total of 22 subjects completed the study. At 6 months post-surgery, PA evaluations indicated a reduction in apical graft height (AGH) of 55.9%, endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG) reduction of 29.6%, and elevated membrane apex (EMA) reduction of 8.4%. CBCT analysis showed slightly higher reductions, with AGH, ESBG, and EMA reductions of 60.4%, 32.6%, and 12.2%, respectively. A paired t-test comparing the accuracy of the 2D and 3D models' ability to detect changes in graft material resulted in a p-value of 0.2168.

conclusionsPeriapical imaging is relatively accurate when standardized, whereas CBCT provides a more precise representation of the graft material distribution and reduction. Significant reductions in AGH, ESBG, and EMA were observed at 6 months, with PAs indicating less change in bone augmentation compared to CBCT. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT06296459 PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The removal of posterior teeth results in expansion of the maxillary sinus, which can limit the bony support for dental implants. To overcome this, the maxillary sinus can be augmented through various techniques and with various materials. This study evaluated augmenting the sinus with a transcrestal approach utilizing a freeze-dried bone allograft. At 6 months postoperatively, x-ray evaluation demonstrated a reduction in graft height and endo-sinus bone gain. Comparison of imaging techniques revealed statistical accuracy of both 2D and 3D models to detect changes in the graft material.

Indexed as

Maxillary SinusSinus Floor AugmentationAdultAgedAllograftsAlveolar Bone LossBone TransplantationCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental Implantation, EndosseousFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedRadiography, Bitewingfreeze‐dried bone allograftosseodensificationsinus augmentation

Identifiers

PMID40674412
PMCPMC13001130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.