Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Consensus on the descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods for heading in football studies: A Delphi study.

Kerry Peek, Andrew G Ross, Paula R Williamson, Julia Georgieva, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Vincent Gouttebarge, Sara Dahlen, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kerry PeekSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-3353
Andrew G RossSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paula R WilliamsonDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Julia GeorgievaSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1843-2672
Thor Einar AndersenOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Tim MeyerInstitute of Sports and Preventive Medicine, Saarland University, Saarbrucken, Germany.
Vincent GouttebargeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0126-4177
Sara DahlenOslo Sports Trauma Research Center, the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Mike ClarkeCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Andreas SernerFIFA Medical, Fédération Internationale de Football Association, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-901X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heading in football (soccer) is a complex skill involving deliberate head-to-ball contact, which may pose short-, medium-, and long-term risk to player brain health. However, understanding header exposure during matches and training sessions, as well as comparing header incidence between studies is currently challenging given the lack of standardisation in descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods. This Delphi study aimed to establish a consensus on the descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods for heading in football research to improve consistency and quality. The study involved 167 participants from diverse football-related backgrounds including coaches, players, medical personnel, and researchers, with consensus achieved to include 27 descriptors in minimum reporting criteria for heading in football research. An additional 27 descriptors were also defined for inclusion in an expanded framework. The operational definition of a header was standardised as "a head-to-ball contact where the player makes a deliberate movement to redirect the trajectory of the ball using their head." The consensus framework provides a standardised approach to heading in football research to enhance data quality and comparability across studies. Improved header incidence data quality has the potential to contribute significantly to our understanding of the risks associated with heading in football to inform future research and practice guidelines.

Indexed as

SoccerDelphi TechniqueHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID40674410
PMCPMC12270182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.