Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674395›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Lung Cancer Management: Revolutionizing Patient Outcomes Through Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.

Taghi Riahi, Bahareh Shateri-Amiri, Amirhossein Hajialiasgary Najafabadi, Sina Garazhian, Hanieh Radkhah, Diar Zooravar, Sahar Mansouri, Roya Aghazadeh, Mohammadreza Bordbar, Shirin Raiszadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Taghi RiahiDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Rasool Akram Medical Complex, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bahareh Shateri-AmiriDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Rasool Akram Medical Complex, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein Hajialiasgary NajafabadiResearch Group Quantitative and Computational Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Sina GarazhianResearch Group of Quantitative and Systems Biology, Max-Planck-Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (MPI-NAT), University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-9939
Hanieh RadkhahDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Diar ZooravarSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0005-3426-2441
Sahar MansouriSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Roya AghazadehSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammadreza BordbarSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin RaiszadehSchool of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with early detection critical for improving prognosis. Traditional machine learning (ML) models have shown limited generalizability in clinical settings. This study proposes a deep learning-based approach using transfer learning to accurately segment lung tumor regions from CT scans and classify images as cancerous or noncancerous, aiming to overcome the limitations of conventional ML models.

methodsWe developed a two-stage model utilizing a ResNet50 backbone within a U-Net architecture for lesion segmentation, followed by a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) for binary classification. The model was trained on publicly available CT scan datasets and evaluated on an independent clinical dataset from Hazrat Rasool Hospital, Iran. Training employed binary cross-entropy and Dice loss functions. Data augmentation, dropout, and regularization were used to enhance model generalizability and prevent overfitting.

resultsThe model achieved 94% accuracy on the real-world clinical test set. Evaluation metrics, including F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), Cohen's kappa, and Dice index, confirmed the model's robustness and diagnostic reliability. In comparison, traditional ML models performed poorly on external test data despite high training accuracy, highlighting a significant generalization gap.

conclusionThis research presents a reliable deep learning framework for lung cancer detection that outperforms traditional ML approaches on external validation. The results demonstrate its potential for clinical deployment. Future work will focus on prospective validation, interpretability techniques, and integration into hospital workflows to support real-time decision making and regulatory compliance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningHumansPrognosisTomography, X-Ray Computedclassification metricsCT scandeep learninglung cancermachine learningResNet50transfer learningtumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID40674395
PMCPMC12269930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.