ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Lung Cancer Management: Revolutionizing Patient Outcomes Through Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lung Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Detection, and Prognosis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Lung Cancer Management: Revolutionizing Patient Outcomes Through Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Detection of protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) ultrasonographic imaging features in dogs using deep learning neural networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsLung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with early detection critical for improving prognosis. Traditional machine learning (ML) models have shown limited generalizability in clinical settings. This study proposes a deep learning-based approach using transfer learning to accurately segment lung tumor regions from CT scans and classify images as cancerous or noncancerous, aiming to overcome the limitations of conventional ML models.
methodsWe developed a two-stage model utilizing a ResNet50 backbone within a U-Net architecture for lesion segmentation, followed by a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) for binary classification. The model was trained on publicly available CT scan datasets and evaluated on an independent clinical dataset from Hazrat Rasool Hospital, Iran. Training employed binary cross-entropy and Dice loss functions. Data augmentation, dropout, and regularization were used to enhance model generalizability and prevent overfitting.
resultsThe model achieved 94% accuracy on the real-world clinical test set. Evaluation metrics, including F1 score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), Cohen's kappa, and Dice index, confirmed the model's robustness and diagnostic reliability. In comparison, traditional ML models performed poorly on external test data despite high training accuracy, highlighting a significant generalization gap.
conclusionThis research presents a reliable deep learning framework for lung cancer detection that outperforms traditional ML approaches on external validation. The results demonstrate its potential for clinical deployment. Future work will focus on prospective validation, interpretability techniques, and integration into hospital workflows to support real-time decision making and regulatory compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.