ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Measuring respectful maternal and newborn care in Nepal: Comparing linked observation and interview data- prospective cohort study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespectful maternal and newborn care is the cornerstone of high-quality care, however, measuring experience of respectful care has challenges since it can be subjective, and dependent on expectations. In this study, we assess the concordance between women's reported experiences of respectful maternal and newborn care and independent observation of their care in Nepal.
methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study among 22832 pregnant women conducted in three high volume hospitals in the country: Koshi Provincial Hospital (Hospital A), Bharatpur Hospital (Hospital B), and Lumbini Provincial Hospital (Hospital C) for 18 months between April 2017 and October 2018. The study implemented direct observation during and semi-structured interviews at discharge to evaluate the quality of maternal and newborn care in three large public hospitals. For this analysis, three domains for respectful maternal and newborn care were considered: 1) consent and counselling 2) respect and dignity of care, and 3) care provision. The two data sources (observation checklist and semi-structured interview) were plotted to these three domains to identify common indicators. The level of agreement (LOA) between two measurements was compared using Cohen kappa scores (κ) and Bland Altman plots.
findingsDuring the study period, 22832 women had both observation and interview completed. For consent and counseling, 78.8% of women reported being informed about routine care while only 47.3% were observed to have been consented and counseled (k, LOA = 59.1%). For respect and dignity of care, 99.0% of women reported being treated with dignity and respect and 96.4% were observed (k, LOA = 95.4%). For care provision, 37.9% reported that the infant was kept in immediate skin-to-skin contact after delivery while only 3.9% were observed (k, LOA = 61.7%).
conclusionA significant difference existed between observed and self-reported measures of maternal and newborn care. This study highlights the need for a measurement approach that incorporates independent observations alongside self-reported data. There is also a need to further explore concordance between different sources for progress monitoring.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.