Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674381›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2025

Qualification Criteria of Gene Therapy for Haemophilia-Opinion of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group.

Wolfgang Miesbach, Ana Boban, Pratima Chowdary, Michiel Coppens, Victor Jimenez-Yuste, Robert Klamroth, Greta Mulders, Miguel Crato, Flora Peyvandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Qualification Criteria of Gene Therapy for Haemophilia-Opinion of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wolfgang MiesbachMedical Clinic 2, Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4506-0061
Ana BobanHaemophilia Centre, Department of Haematology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-2336
Pratima ChowdaryKatharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-1051
Michiel CoppensHemophilia Treatment Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Victor Jimenez-YusteHematology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Autonoma University, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3937-3499
Robert KlamrothDepartment for Internal Medicine and Vascular Medicine, Haemophilia Treatment Center, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-8183
Greta MuldersDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2278-3459
Miguel CratoEuropean Haemopilia Consortium, Brussels, Belgium.
Flora PeyvandiFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center and Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7423-9864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing the approval of the first gene therapies for haemophilia, it is essential to develop an optimal infrastructure for the administration of gene therapy. This can be ensured by identifying the criteria for the definition of treatment centres (hub centres) and follow-up centres (spoke centres), as well as establishing effective cooperation between them.

methodsThe interdisciplinary members of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group answered a survey to define requirements for centres participating in gene therapy care, addressing aspects such as product administration, coagulation parameter monitoring, and long-term safety surveillance.

resultsThe majority support the implementation of standardised protocols. Hub centres are expected to maintain high standards of quality and flexibility, possess pharmacist expertise, ensure regulatory compliance, and have experience in gene therapy Spoke centres should be certified haemophilia centres, access to hepatologists and providing 24-h support. Prior to gene therapy, spoke centres manage initial patient interactions, while hub centres handle complex care needs. Post-therapy, both centres can monitor factor levels and liver health. However, hub centres are responsible for managing immunosuppression and facilitating specialist consultations. Collaboration between both centres is crucial for data sharing and the assessment and resolution of adverse events, emphasising the importance of timely test results and regular liver imaging.

conclusionThe survey results highlight essential criteria for the safe and effective delivery of gene therapy through a structured hub-and-spoke model. These include accreditation, clinical trial experience, access to specialized healthcare professionals, and the establishment of standard operating procedures for monitoring and managing adverse events.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyHemophilia AHumansSurveys and Questionnairesgene therapyhaemophiliahaemophilia centrehub and spoke centrequalification criteria

Identifiers

PMID40674381
PMCPMC12462593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.