ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2025
Qualification Criteria of Gene Therapy for Haemophilia-Opinion of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group.
Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Qualification Criteria of Gene Therapy for Haemophilia-Opinion of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing the approval of the first gene therapies for haemophilia, it is essential to develop an optimal infrastructure for the administration of gene therapy. This can be ensured by identifying the criteria for the definition of treatment centres (hub centres) and follow-up centres (spoke centres), as well as establishing effective cooperation between them.
methodsThe interdisciplinary members of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group answered a survey to define requirements for centres participating in gene therapy care, addressing aspects such as product administration, coagulation parameter monitoring, and long-term safety surveillance.
resultsThe majority support the implementation of standardised protocols. Hub centres are expected to maintain high standards of quality and flexibility, possess pharmacist expertise, ensure regulatory compliance, and have experience in gene therapy Spoke centres should be certified haemophilia centres, access to hepatologists and providing 24-h support. Prior to gene therapy, spoke centres manage initial patient interactions, while hub centres handle complex care needs. Post-therapy, both centres can monitor factor levels and liver health. However, hub centres are responsible for managing immunosuppression and facilitating specialist consultations. Collaboration between both centres is crucial for data sharing and the assessment and resolution of adverse events, emphasising the importance of timely test results and regular liver imaging.
conclusionThe survey results highlight essential criteria for the safe and effective delivery of gene therapy through a structured hub-and-spoke model. These include accreditation, clinical trial experience, access to specialized healthcare professionals, and the establishment of standard operating procedures for monitoring and managing adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.