ArticlePloS one2025
Racial and linguistic ideologies and formative assessment practices of U.S. science teachers: A preregistered conceptual replication and extension.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Language, race, and racism are deeply connected in the United States and throughout the world. Over the past 10 years, a growing body of research has argued that many language ideologies and racial ideologies are closely associated with each other. However, few studies have sought to quantify these proposed associations by directly measuring the language ideologies, racial ideologies, and language-related behaviors of participants. In a recently published study of K-12 preservice teachers, we identified substantial correlations between racial ideologies and seemingly race-neutral language ideologies, as well as correlations between these language ideologies and the written feedback participants generated during formative assessment of student science writing. These findings have important implications for the social sciences; however, their significance is contingent in part on their reproducibility and generalizability. For this reason, we conducted a preregistered conceptual replication and extension using a larger sample of current U.S. science teachers (n = 387 teachers from 42 U.S. states). We demonstrate that all but one of the findings from our previous study are successfully replicated, and we identify several new findings. We discuss implications for research in science education, linguistic anthropology, social psychology, and sociology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.