Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Impact of the entorhinal feed-forward connection to the CA3 on hippocampal coding.

Samuel B Lassers, Shazfa S Khatri, Ruiyi Chen, Yash S Vakilna, William C Tang, Gregory J Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel B LassersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-7528
Shazfa S KhatriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1426-3085
Ruiyi ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Yash S VakilnaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
William C TangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Gregory J BrewerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-1832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each sub-region of the hippocampus plays a critical computational role in the formation of episodic learning and memory, but studies have yet to show and interpret the individual spiking dynamics of each region and how that information is passed between each subregion. This is in part due to the difficulty in accessing individual communicating axons. Here, we created a novel microfluidic device that facilitates network growth of four separated hippocampal subregions over a micro-electrode array. This device enabled monitoring single axons over two electrodes so direction of spike propagation in interregional communication could be ascertained. In this in vitro hippocampal study, we compared spiking dynamics across two novel four-compartment device architectures: one with four sets of axon tunnels between subregions that excluded the perforant pathway from EC-CA3, and one with five sets of axon tunnels that included the EC-CA3 connection. We found 30-90% faster feed-forward firing rates (shorter interspike intervals) in axons in the five-tunnel model with 35-75% slower bursting dynamics (longer interburst intervals) compared to the four-tunnel model. The CA3-CA1 and CA1-EC axons had more spikes in bursts in the five-tunnel architecture than the four-tunnel counterpart suggesting more structured information transfer. Feedback firing rates were similar between configurations. The faster feed-forward inter-regional spiking in the more natural five-tunnel than the four-tunnel configuration suggests tighter control of spiking and possibly more precise communication between subregions.

Indexed as

CA3 Region, HippocampalEntorhinal CortexHippocampusAction PotentialsAnimalsAxonsCA1 Region, HippocampalMaleModels, NeurologicalRats

Identifiers

PMID40674319
PMCPMC12270128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.