ArticlePloS one2025
Ferrocene thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives cause DNA damage and interfere with DNA repair in triple-negative breast cancer cells.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, ferrocene-containing thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives were screened against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines, which represent an aggressive subtype of the disease predominant in women of African descent. The lack of key receptors in TNBC poses a therapeutic challenge as there are limited targeted treatment options available for this subtype. The ferrocene thiazolidine-2,4-dione derivatives displayed toxicity against HCC70 TNBC cells in the low-moderate micromolar range (5-46 μM) and two compounds were selected for further study, with IC50 values of 7.54 ± 1.07 μM (OY25) and 5.59 ± 1.24 μM (OY29). Additionally, compounds OY25 and OY29 were screened against other cancer and non-tumourigenic cell lines and found to be less toxic against non-cancerous breast epithelial cell line MCF-12A (SI = 2.2188 and 4.4359, respectively) compared to the HCC70 TNBC cell line. Compounds OY25 and OY29 show a dual mode of action involving increased reactive oxygen species generation and induction of DNA damage. In silico docking analysis and competitive DNA binding fluorescence-based assays revealed that the compounds disrupt key DNA damage phosphoprotein levels through binding to the minor groove of DNA. In a combination assay, the compounds acted synergistically and antagonistically with DNA damage-inducing drugs, camptothecin and etoposide, respectively. Meanwhile, in combination with PARP-1 inhibitor, OY25 and OY29 acted synergistically and antagonistically, respectively. Furthermore, in silico results, using the SwissADME web tool, showed that the compounds OY25 and OY29 display desirable ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) profile with parameters within acceptable range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.