Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40674310›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Immunohistochemistry guided segmentation of benign epithelial cells, in situ lesions, and invasive epithelial cells in breast cancer slides.

Maren Høibø, André Pedersen, Vibeke Grotnes Dale, Sissel Marie Berget, Borgny Ytterhus, Cecilia Lindskog, Elisabeth Wik, Lars A Akslen, Ingerid Reinertsen, Erik Smistad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Maren HøibøDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2598-0094
André PedersenDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Vibeke Grotnes DaleDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-7536
Sissel Marie BergetDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Borgny YtterhusDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Cecilia LindskogDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine Research unit, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabeth WikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Lars A AkslenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ingerid ReinertsenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik SmistadDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Marit VallaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology enables automatic analysis of histopathological sections using artificial intelligence. Automatic evaluation could improve diagnostic efficiency and find associations between morphological features and clinical outcome. For development of such prediction models in breast cancer, identifying invasive epithelial cells, and separating these from benign epithelial cells and in situ lesions would be important. In this study, we trained an attention gated U-Net for segmentation of epithelial cells in hematoxylin and eosin stained breast cancer sections. We generated epithelial ground truths by immunohistochemistry, restaining hematoxylin and eosin sections with cytokeratin AE1/AE3, combined with pathologists' annotations. Tissue microarrays from 839 patients, and whole slide images from two patients, were used for training and evaluation of the models. The sections were derived from four breast cancer cohorts. Tissue microarray cores from a fifth cohort of 21 patients was used as a second test set. In quantitative evaluation, mean Dice scores of 0.70, 0.79, and 0.75 were achieved for invasive epithelial cells, benign epithelial cells, and in situ lesions, respectively. In qualitative scoring (0-5) by pathologists, the best results were reached for all epithelium and invasive epithelium, with scores of 4.7 and 4.4, respectively. Scores for benign epithelium and in situ lesions were 3.7 and 2.0, respectively. The proposed model segmented epithelial cells well, but further work is needed for accurate subclassification into benign, in situ, and invasive cells.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEpithelial CellsImmunohistochemistryFemaleHumansTissue Array Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40674310
PMCPMC12270177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.