Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40673940›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Magnetic resonance urography (MRU): technique mastery and illustrative case reviews.

Nanda Deepa Thimmappa, Irfan Kazi, Ayesha Nasrullah, Mohamed Elbanan, Azfar Siddiqui, David Raj, Dana Mazuru, Mark Wakefield, Elizabeth Malm-Buatsie, Amr Abdelaziz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nanda Deepa ThimmappaUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA. tnandadeepa@gmail.com.
Irfan KaziUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Ayesha NasrullahThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Mohamed ElbananUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Azfar SiddiquiUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
David RajUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Dana MazuruUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Mark WakefieldUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Elizabeth Malm-BuatsieUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.
Amr AbdelazizUniversity of Missouri Health System, Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU) is a comprehensive, non-invasive imaging technique that offers detailed anatomical and functional assessment of the urinary system without radiation exposure. It is particularly valuable in pediatric, pregnant, and renally impaired patients, and in those with CT contrast allergies. Multiparametric MRU sequences can evaluate congenital anomalies, functional obstruction, urothelial tumors, and postoperative anatomy. Advancements in imaging technology such as respiratory gating, compressed sensing, and motion correction, have significantly improved image quality and patient comfort. The introduction of the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) has standardized bladder cancer staging, aiding in inter-reader reproducibility and treatment planning. This review outlines MRU technique, protocol optimization, artifact mitigation strategies, and specific pediatric and oncologic applications. Illustrative cases highlight the versatility of MRU in clinical practice. With advanced MRI techniques, increasing expertise among radiologists and familiarity among urologists, MRU is emerging as a first-line modality in select urologic conditions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUrographyUrologic DiseasesHumansCollecting systemMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance urographyMRIMRUUrothelial cell carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.